A pro-immigration group has formally complained to Elections Alberta, alleging the provincial government’s new referendum website is using public funds to promote a one-sided perspective on immigration policies.

Complaint Details and Allegations

The complaint, led by Edmonton lawyer Avnish Nanda, argues the website is designed to encourage a ‘yes’ vote on the nine referendum questions scheduled for October 19. These questions address constitutional amendments and proposed changes to Alberta’s immigration system.

Focus on Financial Costs

Avnish Nanda points out the website emphasizes the costs associated with temporary residents – estimated at over $1 billion annually – while failing to mention the taxes paid by these individuals. “People on work or student visas pay taxes and contribute to our economy. The government’s omission of this fact is misleading,” Nanda stated.

Changes to Referendum Advertising Rules

The complaint also highlights recent legislative changes. In July 2025, amendments were made to Alberta’s election laws, removing restrictions on government advertising during standalone referendums.

Concerns Over Government Influence

Nanda describes this change as a “loophole” allowing the government to unduly influence public opinion. “This was illegal just months ago for a reason—governments should never tilt the scales in elections or referendums,” he said.

Government and Expert Responses

Premier Danielle Smith defended the website, stating it provides factual information in an accessible format. She affirmed the government’s support for the policies, which were developed through public consultations via the Alberta Next Panel. “These are policies we believe in, and we’re seeking a mandate from Albertans,” Smith said.

Call for Balanced Information

Lori Williams, a political scientist at Mount Royal University, noted that while governments typically advocate for their preferred outcomes, the information presented must be balanced and clear. “The website should explain the potential impact of these policies, including how internal migration from other provinces could also affect costs,” Williams explained. She also stressed the importance of transparency regarding the government’s data sources.

Previous Criticism and Ongoing Debate

This controversy follows earlier criticism of survey questions used by the Alberta Next Panel, which were revised after being deemed misleading. The government maintains the referendum questions reflect Albertans’ priorities, including sustainable immigration and provincial sovereignty. The debate over the website’s neutrality underscores broader concerns about fairness in Alberta’s democratic processes as the October vote approaches.