Jury selection has commenced in New York City for the latest retrial of former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, who faces a rape charge. This marks the third time Weinstein has stood trial for this specific allegation, with the prosecution's case now centering on the testimony of hairstylist and actor Jessica Mann.

Weinstein's Legal Battles Continue

Harvey Weinstein appeared in Manhattan criminal court on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, for the beginning of his retrial. The former film producer, whose name became a focal point of the #MeToo movement, is again under intense legal scrutiny. The current trial's scope is significantly narrowed, focusing exclusively on the allegations made by Jessica Mann, who claims Weinstein raped her in a Manhattan hotel in 2013.

This contrasts with previous trials that encompassed a wider range of accusations from multiple accusers in both New York and Los Angeles. Weinstein continues to deny all charges, asserting his innocence and stating that any past actions, while potentially improper, did not involve assault.

New Evidence and Legal Strategy

Prosecutors may introduce new evidence in this retrial, potentially including testimony from a court security officer regarding a statement Weinstein allegedly made in 2020 after his initial sexual assault conviction, which was later overturned. The defense is actively opposing the inclusion of this statement, citing its late emergence.

Key Evidence Under Consideration

Judge Curtis Farber is deliberating on the admissibility of various pieces of evidence. This includes whether to permit discussions about a claims fund established for Weinstein's accusers and the mention of erectile dysfunction medication allegedly used by Weinstein. The defense's strategy regarding the fund is also a point of contention.

Shifting Legal Representation

The legal team representing Weinstein has seen a change, with Marc Agnifilo and his associates now leading the defense. They have taken over from Arthur Aidala, who is now concentrating on Weinstein's appeals and related civil matters. Both Agnifilo and Aidala are prominent figures in New York's legal community.

Background and #MeToo Movement Impact

Weinstein's career was marked by significant influence in the entertainment industry, with acclaimed films like 'Shakespeare in Love' and 'Pulp Fiction' under his production banner. He was also known for his support of the Democratic party. The wave of accusations against him began in 2017, significantly fueling the #MeToo movement.

Previous Verdicts and Appeals

Weinstein's legal journey has been complex, involving multiple trials and appeals. His initial New York convictions were overturned, necessitating this retrial. In a prior proceeding, he was convicted of forcing oral sex on Miriam Haley but acquitted of other charges. The jury in that trial was unable to reach a verdict on the rape charge involving Jessica Mann, leading to the current proceedings.

Weinstein reportedly considered a guilty plea at one point but ultimately decided against it. Jessica Mann has previously testified, detailing interactions with Weinstein, including a moment where she stated, “I don’t want to do this.” The defense contends that the women willingly engaged in sexual relations for career advancement, while accusers maintain Weinstein exploited his Hollywood power.

Potential Sentencing and Health Concerns

Weinstein, 73, faces the possibility of additional prison time. The rape charge carries a potential sentence of up to four years. He has already served time related to his conviction involving Miriam Haley. Weinstein's health has been a concern, and he has reportedly expressed worries about his living conditions, including the potential for spending his final days at Rikers Island jail.

His legal team has argued that juror bias affected his previous New York conviction and is appealing the verdict from the Los Angeles trial. These ongoing legal proceedings underscore the intricate challenges of such cases and the profound impact of the #MeToo movement on legal and societal norms.