A Florida couple is navigating a complex legal and emotional battle after discovering their baby was not genetically theirs due to an error during in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Tiffany Score and Steven Mills are now fighting to keep the child, Shea, born in December 2025.

The IVF Mix-Up

Score and Mills underwent IVF treatment at the Fertility Clinic of Orlando. The process involved egg retrieval, sperm fertilization, and embryo transfer. Their first embryo transfer in February 2025 was unsuccessful, but a second attempt in April of the same year resulted in Shea’s birth.

Discovery and Lawsuit

Genetic testing later revealed Shea was not genetically related to either Score or Mills. The couple filed a lawsuit against the clinic and Dr. Milton McNichol to identify Shea’s biological parents and determine the fate of their own embryos. The lawsuit detailed the entire IVF process.

Changing Hearts

Initially, Score and Mills expressed a ‘moral obligation’ to reunite Shea with her biological family, identified as ‘Patient 004’ through genetic testing. However, they have since changed their position and are now determined to retain custody of Shea.

A Deep Emotional Bond

The couple emphasizes the strong emotional connection they have formed with Shea, describing her as the ‘light of their lives.’ They acknowledge the unanswered questions about their own biological children but prioritize Shea’s well-being. They have publicly affirmed their commitment to being Shea’s parents ‘forever.’

Privacy and Legal Uncertainty

Score and Mills are respecting the privacy of Shea’s biological parents, who have not been publicly named. The legal outcome of the case remains uncertain, with the central issue being whether the couple will be granted permanent custody.

Public Sentiment and Ethical Concerns

Score has shared family photos on Facebook, expressing gratitude for Shea’s health and emphasizing that she is ‘ours in every way that matters.’ Despite the challenging circumstances, the couple reports feeling gratitude rather than anger. This case highlights the potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with assisted reproductive technologies and the need for stringent protocols.