Utah Leaders Launch Independent Probe into Supreme Court Justice's Alleged Ties to Attorney Utah Governor, Senate President, and House Speaker initiate an independent investigation into allegations of an improper relationship between Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagen and attorney David Reymann, after initial review by the Judicial Conduct Commission was deemed insufficient. A joint investigation into allegations of an improper relationship between Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagen and attorney David Reymann has been initiated by Utah's top state officials. Governor Spencer Cox, Senate President Stuart Adams, and House Speaker Mike Schultz have voiced concerns regarding the initial handling of a complaint that suggested a conflict of interest. The complaint, obtained through a public records request, originated from a Provo-based attorney who claimed Justice Hagen’s ex-husband reported inappropriate text messages exchanged between the justice and Reymann. Reymann was involved in a redistricting case that resulted in a new congressional map for Utah. Justice Hagen voluntarily recused herself from the redistricting case in September, citing a renewal of close friendships with both Reymann and Cheylynn Hayman, another attorney and shareholder at Reymann's firm. Hayman also holds the position of chair for the Judicial Conduct Commission, and she likewise recused herself from the commission’s review of the complaint. The Judicial Conduct Commission conducted a preliminary investigation, which included interviewing Justice Hagen’s ex-husband, but ultimately decided not to proceed with a full inquiry, deeming further investigation unnecessary. This decision has drawn sharp criticism from the state's legislative leaders. Governor Cox, Senate President Adams, and House Speaker Schultz stated that the preliminary review by the Judicial Conduct Commission and the court did not adequately address critical questions. They emphasized the necessity of transparency and accountability when examining allegations involving public officials to ascertain the truth and preserve public trust. The leaders announced their intention to conduct an independent investigation to ensure a comprehensive and objective examination of the facts, underscoring the vital importance of maintaining confidence in governmental institutions. Justice Hagen has vehemently denied any inappropriate relationship, and Reymann has likewise dismissed the allegations as false. Hagen’s ex-husband reportedly described the text exchanges as initially lighthearted before becoming more suggestive, though he did not endorse the complaint filed by attorney Michael Worley, he acknowledged its factual accuracy. Justice Hagen has maintained that she was faithful in her marriage for over three decades and never engaged in extramarital relations before her separation