Baywatch Star David Charvet Cleared in Fatal Dog Collision Case Former Baywatch actor David Charvet has been cleared of criminal wrongdoing following an incident where his vehicle struck and killed a dog. While the owner alleged a hit-and-run, authorities classified the event as a traffic collision, citing Charvet's immediate call to the police. Former Baywatch star David Charvet is at the center of a controversial incident involving the death of a dog. The actor was accused of a hit-and-run after his pickup truck struck and killed an 11-year-old white English Labrador. The dog's owner, Sarah Errico, alleges that Charvet drove past while she was walking her dogs on leashes. According to Errico, Charvet did not stop but instead proceeded towards a gated community, where she believes he then contacted the authorities. Errico and her husband rushed their beloved pet to a veterinarian, but tragically, the dog could not be saved and had to be euthanized. Following the incident, Errico filed a police report for a hit-and-run. However, law enforcement officials have stated that they do not classify the event as a hit-and-run. According to information obtained by TMZ, police consider the incident a traffic collision because Charvet did, in fact, call the police at the time of the event. Charvet, on the other hand, asserts that the dog was not on a leash at the time of the accident and that he attempted to swerve to avoid the animal. Despite his efforts, he was unable to prevent the collision. Representatives for Charvet have emphasized that he is a devoted animal lover and a responsible dog owner who would never intentionally harm an animal. They also conveyed that his thoughts are with the family who experienced the loss of their dog. Later on the day of the incident, law enforcement informed TMZ that Charvet had been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in connection with the incident. Charvet, who played Matt Brody in the original Baywatch series from 1992 to 1996, later transitioned to acting on Melrose Place and eventually stepped away from Hollywood to pursue a career in construction. This particular incident involving David Charvet has sparked discussion about the definitions of traffic incidents and the responsibilities of drivers. While Errico's account emphasizes the perceived lack of immediate stopping and the tragic outcome, the police's classification hinges on the driver's subsequent actions, specifically calling the authorities. Charvet's defense highlights the unpredictable nature of animal behavior on roads and his efforts to mitigate the damage. The legal distinction between a hit-and-run and a traffic collision, though seemingly semantic, carries significant weight in terms of potential charges and public perception. The situation underscores the complexities that can arise when accidents involve pets, especially when there are differing accounts of the events leading up to and immediately following the collision. The focus for law enforcement in such cases often shifts to whether the involved parties acted responsibly once the incident occurred, including reporting the accident and rendering aid if possible, even if the outcome is tragic. The actor's history as a public figure also inevitably adds a layer of scrutiny to the proceedings, drawing more attention than a typical traffic accident might