Following the unrest in Southport, a £15 million community recovery fund was established to rebuild local trust.. However, an investigative report alleges that these public funds were diverted to support political activist training.

Advertisement

The £13,450 payment to the School of Organising

An audit of council spending has revealed that a local body in the Birmingham area handed £13 ,450 to a group known as the School of Organising. According to the investigative report, this group is linked to former staff members of the anti-cancel-culture collective Hope Not Hate. The training provided by the School of Organising reportedly focused on specific political tactics, including "sloganeering" and short-form media campaigns. These sessions allegedly included proxy tactics designed to destabilize the rallies of political opponents.

A pattern stretching from Birmingham to Blackpool and Sheffield

The distribution of these funds appears to be part of a wider trend rather than an isolated incident . The report states that the city-wide initiative in Birmingham was later replicated by local councils in both Blackpool and Sheffield. This movement of money follows the £15 million package announced by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner after the Southport disturbances, which were precipitated by a shooting at a children's dance party.

The timing of these fund drawdowns has drawn scrutiny, particularly as the political landscape shifts under Prime Minister Andy Burnham. Critics argue that the replication of these programs across multiple cities represents a covert form of political influence that violates guidelines on the use of public funds.

Targeting Reform UK and Nigel Farage in activist curricula

Training sessions reportedly focused on persuading working-class voters that right-wing parties were detrimental to social cohesion. The curriculum allegedly claimed that the Conservative Party and Reform UK blamed migrants for pressure on public services. one lecture reportedly described Nigel Farage, the former leader of Reform UK, as a "classic authoritarian populist who seeks to undermine democracy." The training allegedly compared him to a global cadre of demagogues, including Donald Trump , Marine Le Pen, and Tommy Robinson.

The goal, as described in the report, was to engineer public sentiment against these specific political figures. By doing so, the program allegedly sought to convert working-class voters toward the ideological base of the Labour Party.

Who is responsible for policing these partisan training claims?

While the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has defended the allocations, significant questions remain regarding the oversight of these funds. a spokesperson for the ministry stated that "councils are not permitted to use taxpayers' money to fund partisan issues or party-political activity," a claim that remains contentious given the explicitly left-wing nature of the recipients. It is currently unclear how the Ministry will address the allegation that these groups are being used to bypass rules against partisan activity, nor has it been confirmed if the judiciary will examine whether these expenditures violate established norms regarding the separation of public finance from political campaigning.