Rep. Nancy Mace is leading the effort to compel former Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify before the House Oversight Committee concerning the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. This push comes amid reports that Bondi intends to skip her scheduled deposition on April 14th.

Committee Scrutiny and Subpoena Validity

The House Oversight Committee is investigating the DOJ’s compliance with legal requirements and its management of the Epstein case during Bondi’s time in office. The core issue revolves around whether a subpoena remains valid even after an individual has left their position.

Subpoena Focused on Individual, Not Title

The subpoena, issued on March 14th and approved with bipartisan support, specifically named Pam Bondi as an individual, rather than her official title. Mace and her allies argue this means Bondi is still obligated to appear and answer questions under oath, regardless of her departure from office. This position is supported by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA).

Bipartisan Support for Testimony

Representatives Mace and Khanna jointly sent a letter to Chairman James Comer, emphasizing Bondi’s continuing obligation to testify. They believe it is crucial for the American public to receive answers regarding the Epstein case and any potential shortcomings in the investigation.

Khanna Highlights Prior Commitment

Khanna emphasized Bondi’s previous promise to comply with the subpoena and the need for her to address questions about the release of remaining files and the possibility of new prosecutions. Mace also noted that the committee has subpoenaed former Attorneys General from multiple administrations, demonstrating a commitment to accountability across party lines.

DOJ Response and Trump's Perspective

The Department of Justice maintains that the subpoena is no longer valid. However, Mace and Khanna disagree, asserting Bondi’s responsibility to answer questions. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that President Trump’s decision to replace Bondi was unrelated to the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein case.

Broader Context of Accountability

The push for Bondi’s testimony reflects a broader commitment to transparency and accountability. Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, co-authors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, have already reviewed an unredacted version of the Epstein files. The committee’s efforts continue as the investigation into the Epstein case remains a matter of significant public interest.