The recently released ‘Michael’ biopic offers a look at the life and career of the King of Pop, prompting a wave of nostalgia and, for some, a lingering sense of discomfort. The film charts Jackson’s rise to superstardom, but its approach to his complex legacy leaves room for debate.

A Childhood Shaped by the King of Pop

For many, Michael Jackson wasn’t just a musician; he was a defining cultural figure. The author recalls a childhood fascination with Jackson, sharing a youthful desire with his brother to even change their names in homage to their idol. Despite limited access to MTV, they eagerly sought out his iconic music videos like ‘Beat It,’ ‘Bad,’ and ‘Thriller.’

From 'Moonwalker' to Maturation

The VHS tape of Moonwalker was a constant source of entertainment, demonstrating the depth of their early adoration. However, as the author matured, a sense of unease began to develop, leading to a gradual distancing from Jackson’s work. This evolving relationship shaped their expectations for the biopic.

A Film of Compelling Moments and Missed Opportunities

Approaching the film with reluctance, the author found the experience mirrored their personal journey with Jackson – a blend of nostalgia and reservation. The biopic excels at portraying Jackson’s extraordinary ascent to fame, a narrative that resonates even with those familiar with his story.

Capturing the Scale of Superstardom

The film shines when showcasing the creative process behind his music and the sheer scale of his superstardom. It effectively conveys Jackson’s transformation from a child prodigy to a global icon. The author attempted to explain Jackson’s impact to their children, who compared him to Taylor Swift, an analogy that ultimately felt insufficient.

The movie vividly captures the frenzy surrounding his concerts and the profound cultural impact he had worldwide, serving as a reminder of his unparalleled influence. It illustrates a level of fame that feels almost unattainable in today’s media landscape.

A Sanitized Portrayal?

However, the biopic’s strength is also its weakness. The film leans towards a polished and somewhat sanitized portrayal of Jackson, resulting in an incomplete picture. While acknowledging controversies, it avoids a deep and nuanced exploration of them.

Hesitancy to Confront the Shadows

This reluctance to fully confront the darker aspects of Jackson’s life leaves a sense of something missing. The film acknowledges the shadows but doesn’t fully illuminate them, offering an incomplete and ultimately unsatisfying portrait of a complex and flawed individual. The careful navigation around sensitive topics prevents the film from being a truly definitive biopic.