A significant lack of mandatory educational standards regarding the September 11 attacks has allowed various political activists to introduce controversial lesson plans in U.S. schools. These materials reportedly downplay the role of Islamic terrorism while emphasizing American culpability and the rise of Islamophobia. This trend is occurring even within the New York City school system, where no standardized curriculum for the attacks exists.
The legislative void in all but Arizona and Florida
Currently, only Arizona and Florida legally mandate that the 9/11 attacks be taught in public schools, according to the report. While ten other states have statutes that encourage the topic—ranging from simple moments of silence to school assemblies—the vast majority of the country lacks a formal requirement. This legislative gap has prompted Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-Long Island) to push for new legislation that would require a 9/11 curriculum in all 50 states.
This vacuum reflects a broader national struggle over how the United States teaches its own trauma. By leaving the narrative to local discretion or optional guidelines, the state effectively permits a fragmented historical memory where the same event is taught in wildly different ways depending on the district's political leaning.
UPenn's 'Teaching Beyond September 11th' in four state systems
The University of Pennsylvania's Graduate School of Education developed a curriculum titled "Teaching Beyond September 11th," which has been recommended for use in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and Oregon.. As the report states, this framework devotes only a single paragraph to the attacks themselves and avoids labeling the perpetrators as terrorists. Instead, the lessons focus heavily on "Right-Wing Extremism" and "Islamophobia and the Oval Office."
The curriculum's phrasing is particularly contentious; it notes that the "US accused Saudi national Osama bin Laden" of masterminding the attacks, rather than stating it as a fact. This approach aligns with a wider academic trend of "decolonizing" history, where the focus shifts from the actions of non-state actors to the systemic failures or aggressions of the state. However, critics argue this removes the essential context of Jihadist motivations.
The 66% failure rate reported by Middle East studies professors
A poll released by the Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa suggests a crisis of basic factual knowledge among college students. According to the report, 66% of Middle East studies professors believe their students cannot correctly identify who carried out the 9/11 attacks or why they happened.
This statistic raises critical questions about the efficacy of current educational standards. It remains unclear, however, what the specific sample size of this poll was or if these professors are observing a trend across all universities or only within specific ideological hubs. The report does not provide the raw data or the methodology used by the Association for the Study of the Middle East and Africa to reach this 66% figure.
The Hudson Institute's warning on the 'leftist project'
Zineb Riboua, a Research Fellow at the Hudson Institute, claims that the effort to rewrite 9/11 history is part of a strategic project to reduce American sovereignty by teaching children that the U.S. is responsible for global atrocities. This sentiment is echoed in the "Voices Ethnic Studies" curriculum used in Pittsburgh public schools, which describes the U.S. as a "colonizer" and focuses on the resulting Islamophobia without mentioning the death toll or the attackers.
Further complicating the landscape is the National Education Association (NEA), the national teachers union, which provides resources quoting professor Edward Said . These materials suggest that the 9/11 attacks were a consequence of American support for Israel. By framing a terrorist act as a predictable outcome of foreign policy, these resources move the classroom discussion from historical analysis to geopolitical indictment.
Comments 0