On May 6, 2022, Los Angeles‑based artist Fenix Flexin performed at the SECRET SESH X SAC NFT Event, where his new single RUBBERZ sparked debate over its authenticity. The track’s 1980s‑inspired synth‑pop style prompted fans to question whether it was human‑crafted or AI‑generated, a claim the rapper swiftly refuted.

RUBBERZ’s Retro‑Futuristic Sound Sparks AI Speculation

According to the source, the polished, retro‑futuristic aesthetic of RUBBERZ led many listeners to suspect artificial intelligence involvement. The artist explained that the perceived artificiality stemmed from heavy auto‑tune and reverb, not from machine‑made production. Fenix Flexin also admitted to using a fake United Kingdom accent to add novelty, a detail that further fueled the debate.

Two‑Year Plan to Re‑invent Musical Identity

The report says Flexin has mapped out a comprehensive strategy to overhaul his sound over the next 24 months. He intends to release incremental fragments of his new direction through solo projects, allowing fans to acclimate gradually . This gradual evolution is framed as a step toward aligning his music with his personal growth as a mature artist.

Audience Reaction and the Authenticity Debate

Fans of the rap‑social media scene reacted strongly , with a significant portion convinced the track was AI‑generated. The source notes that the core theme of Flexin’s music—celebrating material success—remains unchanged, even as the sonic palette shifts dramatically. The controversy highlights a growing tension in the industry where the line between human and machine artistry becomes increasingly blurred.

Unanswered Questions About the Transformation Process

While Flexin outlines a two‑year plan, the source does not detail the specific genres or collaborators he intends to explore.. It also leaves unclear whether the artist will fully abandon his previous rap style or integrate it into the new synth‑pop framework. Finally, the long‑term impact on his fanbase remains uncertain,as the source reports only the initial backlash without follow‑up data.