Matthew Smylie , a 31-year-old from Sault Ste. Marie,has pleaded guilty to choking and weapon-based assault. This legal resolution follows a previous mistrial and the withdrawal of sexual assault charges by the Crown.
The 32-billion-to-one DNA match that sealed the case
Forensic evidence played a pivotal role in securing the guilty plea from Matthew Smylie. According to the report, the Centre for Forensic Sciences analyzed a swab taken from the fingernails of the victim's right hand. The resulting statistical analysis determined that the DNA found was 32 billion times more likely to have come from Smylie and the victim than from an unrelated unknown person.
This biological evidence was critical because it linked Smylie directly to the physical struggle. Investigators had previously received a convicted-offender notification connected to Smylie after the initial sample was submitted, which prompted a warrant for his DNA to confirm the match.
A one-minute choking and a kitchen knife
The violence in Sault Ste . Marie escalated when Matthew Smylie refused to leave a residence. Court documents state that after the victim attempted to intimidate Smylie into leaving by picking up two kitchen knives, Smylie responded by grabbing her by the neck and pushing her to the ground.
The report says that Smylie choked the woman for approximately one minute, leaving her unable to breathe or speak. After she managed to stand up, she was knocked down again, at which point Smylie held a kitchen knife against her throat before finally leaving the premises. The victim subsequently sought treatment at the Sault Area Hospital Sexual Assault Care Clinic.
Six months of house arrest for Matthew Smylie
Justice Annalisa Rasaiah handed down a sentence of eight months to be served in the community. As reported, the first six months of this term will be served under house arrest, followed by 18 months of probation.
In addition to the house arrest, the court imposed a weapons prohibition and a DNA order. Smylie is strictly prohibited from contacting or approaching the victim as part of his requirement to keep the peace and be of good behaviour.
The strategic withdrawal of sexual assault charges
The legal resolution of this Sault Ste. Marie case is notable for what was removed from the indictment. While Smylie admitted to the choking and weapon charges, the Crown withdrew the remaining allegations of assault and sexual assault.
This move effectively cancelled new trial dates that had been scheduled for the fall. Such withdrawals are common in plea negotiations where the prosecution secures a guaranteed conviction on violent charges in exchange for dropping more difficult-to-prove allegations, especially following a mistrial that has already exhausted judicial resources .
The missing details behind the publication ban
Despite the guilty plea, significant gaps remain in the public record due to a court-ordered publication ban designed to protect the victim's identity. Because of this legal restriction, the specific date of the attack has not been disclosed.
Furthermore, the nature of the relationship between the victim and Matthew Smylie remains unknown. While the forensic evidence provided a concrete link, the interpersonal context of the encounter remains shielded from public view.
Comments 0