KIRO broadcasters Angela Poe Russell and Jim Dever are questioning why the media has ignored alleged deceptive practices at Phoebe Gates' startup, Phia. The hosts claim the company's leadership was aware of "cookie stuffing" for months before calling it a bug.

Advertisement

The seven-month gap in Phia's "cookie stuffing" disclosure

The controversy surrounding the shopping startup Phia centers on the alleged use of "cookie stuffing," a deceptive digital marketing tactic. According to KIRO hosts, this practice involves the company claiming affiliate commissions on sales that it did not actually drive by surreptitiously placing tracking cookies on users' devices. Such tactics can artificially inflate revenue figures by hijacking credit from legitimate referral sources.

The timeline of awareness within the Phia leadership team is a primary point of contention. as reported by the KIRO broadcast, co-founders Phoebe Gates and Sophia Kianni were allegedly aware of this practice for at least seven months before the company publicly characterized the issue as a mere technical "bug." This distinction is critical, as it separates an accidental software error from a long-running, potentially intentional revenue-generation strategy.

The Stanford "So You Think You Can Rule the World" connection

The scrutiny of Phoebe Gates extends beyond her business ventures into her educational and social associations. the KIRO hosts highlighted her involvement in a secretive, invitation-only course at Stanford University titled "So You Think You Can Rule the World." The hosts described the program as elitist and secretive, suggesting it serves as part of a broader pattern of exclusive environments that insulate the ultra-wealthy from the standard rules of society.

Why the Gates name might be shielding Phia from scrutiny

A significant portion of the criticism leveled by Angela Poe Russell and Jim Dever focuses on a perceived media double standard .. The hosts argued that while minor infractions by lesser-known individuals often receive intense journalistic scrutiny, the alleged fraud involving the daughter of one of the world's wealthiest men has been largely ignored. This suggests a systemic bias where the influence of the Gates family may be dampening the appetite for investigative reporting.

This phenomenon reflects a wider trend in corporate journalism where the social capital of founders can act as a buffer against accountability. When a startup is backed by or associated with global icons, the threshold for "newsworthy" misconduct often shifts higher, leaving potential consumer fraud in the shadows. The hosts expressed frustration that the media is failing its fundamental duty to hold powerful actors to account.

The missing evidence in the Phia fraud allegations

While the allegations presented by the KIRO hosts are serious, several critical pieces of information remain unverified. It is currently unknown whether Phoebe Gates or Sophia Kianni personally authorized the use of cookie stuffing or if it was a localized failure within the engineering team.. Furthermore, the source does not clarify if any regulatory bodies have opened formal investigations into Phia's commission claims. Finally, the media has yet to provide a platform for the Phia founders to respond directly to the specific claim that they knowingly operated with this "bug" for seven months.