Ripple is challenging major Wall Street banks by entering the leveraged ETF financing market through its brokerage arm, Ripple Prime. The San Francisco-based firm aims to provide total-return swap solutions to institutional investors to amplify their market exposure.

Advertisement

The $256 Billion Leveraged ETF Prize

The scale of the opportunity for Ripple Prime is significant, as there are currently 593 leveraged ETFs listed in the United States. According to data from Morningstar Direct, these funds hold assets under management exceeding $256 billion, creating a massive pool of capital that relies on complex financing.

A substantial portion of this market consists of single-stock leveraged ETFs, with 426 such funds utilizing total-return swaps to magnify price movements. by entering this space, Ripple Prime is positioning itself to capture a slice of a market that has historically been the exclusive domain of legacy financial intermediaries.

The $1.25 Billion Hidden Road Acquisition

Ripple's transition into traditional prime brokerage was catalyzed by the April 2025 purchase of Hidden Road, a global multi-asset prime broker, for $1.25 billion. As reported in the source, this entity was integrated and rebranded as Ripple Prime in October 2025, providing the company with an immediate infrastructure for clearing and financing across fixed income, foreign exchange, and derivatives.

This strategic move mirrors a broader trend where crypto-native firms are no longer content with staying in the digital asset silo. By absobring an established player like Hidden Road, Ripple is attempting to bridge the gap between blockchain efficiency and the rigid requirements of institutional finance,effectvely eroding the monopoly held by traditional banks.

Challenging the 8% Effective Interest Rates of Legacy Banks

For years, institutions like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America have dominated the counterparty risk market, charging substantial fees for their services. The source notes that one specific fund pays an overnight bank funding rate plus an additional 4 percent for financing, resulting in an effective interest rate of approximately 8 percent, alongside a 1 percent mnaagement fee.

Ripple Prime intends to compete by offering comparable financing terms but with lower operational overhead. By utilizing blockchain infrastructure , Ripple Prime hopes to attract high-frequency traders and portfolio managers who are seeking more transparent and cost-effective alternatives to the legaccy fee structures of the big banks.

Brevan Howard and the Push for Delta One Trading

The expansion of Ripple Prime's capabilities became more evident in August 2026 with the rollout of its Delta One offering. This product allows institutional clients to trade total-return swaps on indices, U.S.-listed equities, and digital assets through a unified platform, streamlining a process that usually requires multiple banking relationships.

Further strengthening its position, Ripple expanded its partnership on October 6 with Brevan Howard, an alternative asset manager overseeing roughly $35 billion in assets.. This partnership allows Ripple Prime to cross-sell its trading and financing services to a sophisticated client base, proving that the firm can attract top-tier institutional players.

Regulatory Hurdles for Ripple Prime's Blockchain Infrastructure

Despite its technological advantages,Ripple Prime faces significant uncertainty regarding how regulators will view blockchain-based counterparty risk management in high-leverage environments.. The source highlights that the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny to ensure its risk management is robust enough for the volatility associated with leveraged instruments.

It remains unclear exactly how Ripple Prime intends to handle the specific capital requirements that traditional banks like Goldman Sachs use to hedge these swaps. Furthermore, the report does not specify which regulatory jurisdictions Ripple Prime has already secured approval from for its Delta One offerings, leaving a critical question about its global scalability.