White House Sought Changes to Ballroom Review Documents

The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) is responsible for independent reviews of projects on federal land. Recent revelations indicate the White House attempted to expedite approval for President Trump’s ballroom project, raising questions about the commission’s impartiality.

Initial Language and White House Requests

Initially, documents stated the NCPC was reviewing the project due to the White House’s location on federal land, which typically requires federal agency approval. However, the White House requested the commission add a sentence clarifying that the White House is not a federal agency and was seeking review “in the spirit of cooperation.”

Further Revisions and Concerns About Independence

The language was subsequently altered to state that projects on federal land in Washington, D.C., “come to NCPC for review.” This willingness to modify its own authority has sparked concerns about the NCPC’s independence, as reported by The Washington Post. Critics point to the fact that all 12 board members were appointed by President Trump, including three White House staffers.

Criticism of Commission Members’ Qualifications

Concerns have been raised that the White House appointees lack the necessary city or regional planning experience, as stipulated by law. Furthermore, critics question their ability to make impartial decisions. Jon Golinger, a democracy advocate with Public Citizen, described the situation as the White House acting as “a puppet master pulling the strings” behind the scenes.

White House and NCPC Respond

Meghan Hottel-Cox, the NCPC’s general counsel, stated that sharing documents with project applicants for comment and correction is “normal practice.” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle asserted the White House was “working collaboratively in good faith” and not “directing” the commission. Karoline Leavitt, another White House spokesperson, responded to criticism of the ballroom’s design from The New York Times.

Ballroom Construction and Legal Challenges

The ballroom is being constructed on the site of the East Wing, which President Trump demolished last year without prior notice or congressional approval. On Tuesday, Federal Judge Richard Leon, appointed by President George W. Bush, ruled that President Trump is a “steward” of the White House, requiring congressional approval for private donations towards the ballroom’s construction.

Construction Halt and Ongoing Work

Judge Leon ordered a halt to construction, but stayed the order for two weeks, allowing work necessary for safety and security to continue.

Public Opposition and Design Flaws

The NCPC originally planned to vote on the project last month but delayed a decision due to “significant public input.” Over 35,000 public comments were submitted, with 97 percent expressing opposition to the ballroom. Architects, preservationists, and former commissioners also voiced their concerns at last month’s meeting.

Identified Design Issues

Experts have identified numerous design flaws, including stairs leading nowhere, columns obstructing views, the inclusion of fake windows, and an oversized rooftop area.