Utah Valley University report faults security planning for Charlie Kirk event before his shooting An independent after-action report from Utah Valley University says Turning Point USA insisted Charlie Kirk speak outdoors despite security concerns and that the university failed to conduct a formal security assessment before he was fatally shot on Sept. 10, 2025. An independent after-action report released Friday by Utah Valley University says Turning Point USA insisted Charlie Kirk speak outdoors despite security concerns before he was shot and killed on the Orem campus. Report Questions Outdoor Event DecisionThe report also says the university did not properly assess dangers such as the possibility of a rooftop shooter. The review examined security procedures for Kirk's Sept. 10, 2025 talk at Utah Valley University. Kirk was a conservative firebrand and co-founder and CEO of Turning Point USA. The external, independent review was commissioned by the university and looked at planning conversations between Turning Point and university officials as well as the university's response to the shooting.According to the report, the university did not conduct a formal security assessment, did not create a written event action plan and deferred critical decision making to Turning Point USA. Those failures marked the planning for an event that ended with Kirk's assassination. A Turning Point representative insisted at an August 2025 planning meeting that Kirk speak at a courtyard on campus, the report said.The representative said Kirk had been there previously and the organization was familiar with the location. Some university officials expressed reservations about holding the event in an outdoor space with tall buildings around, but ultimately allowed the event to proceed. In our assessment, those decisions were consequential, the report said. The outdoor location created significant protective operations considerations, according to the report.Security Planning Process FailedHowever, the planning process failed to include a documented line-of-sight assessment, a pre-event briefing or a walk-through with security stakeholders. The report also found there was no clear coordination with the speaker's private security team and external law enforcement partners. The review looked at both the lead-up to the event and how the university responded once the shooting occurred. Women prayed at a memorial outside Utah Valley University after Kirk was shot and killed in September 2025.The assassination drew national attention and prompted scrutiny of security planning at the campus. The after-action report was described by the university as external and independent. It assessed security procedures for the talk on the Orem campus. The university released the report on Friday.The findings place responsibility on both Turning Point USA and Utah Valley University. Turning Point pushed for the outdoor courtyard setting, while the university did not formalize its security planning or fully coordinate with outside partners. The report states that the university deferred critical decision making to Turning Point USA. It also says the university did not create a written event action plan.Those omissions left the event without standard security documentation. The courtyard location had tall buildings nearby, which some university officials flagged during planning. The report said the outdoor setting created significant protective operations considerations. A documented line-of-sight assessment was not completed.Assassination Prompted National ScrutinyThe report also noted the absence of a pre-event briefing and a walk-through with security stakeholders. It said there was no clear coordination with Kirk's private security team and external law enforcement partners. Kirk was shot on Sept. 10, 2025, during his appearance at the Orem campus. A memorial grew outside the university in the days after his death.The report released Friday is an after-action review of the security procedures used that day. The university said the review was conducted by an external, independent party. Investigators examined planning conversations between Turning Point and university officials. They also reviewed the university's response to the shooting.The report's key findings focus on decisions made before the event. Turning Point insisted Kirk speak at the courtyard because he had been there before and the organization was familiar with it. University officials allowed the event to proceed despite reservations. The report states that those decisions were consequential in its assessment.It also says the planning process failed to include key security steps, including a documented line-of-sight assessment. The outdoor location created significant protective operations considerations. No formal security assessment was conducted by the university before the event. No written event action plan was created.Critical decision making was deferred to Turning Point USA, according to the report. The report also found no clear coordination with the speaker's private security team or external law enforcement partners. Those findings were among the key conclusions in the after-action report released Friday by Utah Valley University.