Ukraine recently utilized the Pelican (FP-7) ballistic missile to strike a refinery near Moscow during the Russian presidential election. This operation marks the first combat deployment of the Fire Point-developed weapon, signaling a shift in Kyiv's long-range capabilities.

Advertisement

The 200-kilometer reach of the Pelican FP-7

The recent strike on a Moscow-area refinery was executed using the Pelican, also known as the FP-7, a ballistic missile developed by the Ukrainian defense firm Fire Point. According to the report, the FP-7 boasts a range of 200 kilometers and an accuracy envelope of 13 meters, making it a significant upgrade over previous long-range options. Fire Point, which is known for its work on precision missile systems and unmanned aerial vehicles, had completed testing of the Pelican in September before its combat debut.

President Volodymyr Zelensky described the operation as a decisive blow to Russian critical infrastructure. The strike coincided with Russia's election night, a timing that suggests the Ukrainian government intended the attack to serve as a demonstration of strength and a warning to the Kremlin regarding the vulnerability of its domestic assets.

Why Mayor Sergei Sobyanin called the ballistic strike a "drone campaign"

There is a notable discrepaancy between the weapon used and the official narrative provided by Russian authorities. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin characterized the event as a drone strike, claiming that more than 1,600 drones entered the airspace of Moscow on the same night. As the report says, Sobyanin maintained that 450 of these drones were intercepted, though he conceded that some caused damage, including the destruction of a residential building.

The insistence by Moscow officials that this was a drone-led operation may be an attempt to downplay the arrival of a sophisticated ballistic weapon like the Pelican in the capital's vicinity. While drones are common in the conflict ,the deployment of a ballistic missile represents a higher tier of technical capability and a more direct threat to hardened targets.

From the Palianytsia to the prototype FP-9

The use of the Pelican is part of a wider Ukrainian effort to diversify its long-range arsenal. The Ukrainian military is currently utilizing or developing a suite of systems, including the FP-1, RZ-100, MICH-2000, Palianytsia, Vendetta, Liutyi, Bars, Flamingo, and Sichen. This diversification allows Kyiv to saturate Russian defenses with different types of projectiles, complicating the interception efforts of Russian air defense systems.

Further expansion is already underway, as Fire Point continues to push the boundaries of its technology. Iryna Terekh, the chief executive of Fire Point, spoke at a defense conference on September 10 regarding the FP-9, a prototype system with a longer range than the Pelican that is currently undergoing flight tests. This trajectory suggests that the 200-kilometer range of the FP-7 is merely a baseline for future Ukrainian capabilities.

The emergency Paris meeting and Donald Tusk's warnings

The escalation in Moscow has triggered alarm across Europe, with intelligence officials in Poland and France warning that Vladimir Putin may respond by targeting NATO member states. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and French President Emmanuel Macron have both highlighted the severity of the risk, with Macron convening an emergency meeting of political leaders in Paris to address the growing menace of Russian aggression .

European officials fear that the conflict could expand beyond Ukraine's borders through sabotage, drone attacks, or limited ground operations. This tension is compounded by diplomatic efforts from the United States, where foormer President Donald Trump has reportedly emphasized the need for an immediate ceasefire regarding attacks on infrastructure to prevent a broader international confrontation.

Verifying the "billions-dollar" loss and the two civilian casualties

Several claims regarding the impact of the strike remain unverified. Ukrainian officials have characterized the destroyed refinery as a "billions-dollar" asset that sustains the Russian war machine , yet independent financial audits of the facility's value have not been provided. The report relies solely on the Ukrainian narrative for this valuation.

Additionally, the human cost of the barrage is still emerging, with reports of two civilian casualties in the Moscow region. It remains unclear whether these casualties were the direct result of the Pelican missile strike or the broader drone campaign described by Mayor Sergei Sobyanin. The lack of detailed casualty reports from the Russian side leaves a gap in the understanding of the strike's collateral damage.