Tiger Woods Fights for Privacy in DUI Case; Legal Battle Over Prescription Records Tiger Woods' legal team is challenging prosecutors' attempt to subpoena his prescription drug records as part of his DUI case, citing his constitutional right to privacy and requesting a hearing to determine relevance. Woods has pleaded not guilty to DUI charges following a crash in Florida. Tiger Woods' legal team is mounting a strong defense against prosecutors' efforts to obtain his prescription drug records from Lewis Pharmacy. In court filings made public on Wednesday, Woods' attorney, Douglas Duncan, argued that the golf superstar possesses a fundamental constitutional right to privacy concerning these sensitive medical details. The defense is requesting a formal hearing to scrutinize the prosecution's claim that these records are essential to their ongoing criminal investigation into Woods' recent DUI arrest. Duncan emphasized that while this right to privacy isn't absolute, the state must demonstrate a compelling justification for intruding upon Woods' personal information. Prosecutors are seeking specific details about Woods' prescriptions filled between January 1st and March 27th, including the frequency of refills, the quantity of medication, dosage amounts, and any accompanying warnings related to operating a vehicle while under the influence of the prescribed drugs. This request follows Woods' not guilty plea on March 31st to charges stemming from a single-vehicle accident on May 29th. During the incident, his SUV collided with a trailer and overturned near his Florida residence. Law enforcement officers at the scene reported that Woods appeared to be impaired and that two pills were discovered in his pocket. He faces misdemeanor charges for driving under the influence, refusal to submit to a lawful test, and a moving violation for distracted driving. Following his arrest, Woods issued a statement indicating his intention to take a leave of absence from professional golf to focus on his health and seek professional treatment. Reports suggest he entered a rehabilitation facility in Switzerland earlier this month. The defense's objection to the subpoena hinges on the relevance of these prescription records to the criminal proceedings. Should the court deem the records pertinent, Duncan is advocating for a protective order. This order would strictly limit access to Woods' prescription information, ensuring it is only accessible to the state, law enforcement, designated state experts, and the defense. Furthermore, the defense is pushing for a prohibition against the state disclosing these records in response to public records requests. A provision is also sought that would mandate a hearing before any public disclosure of the records or any part thereof, to rigorously assess the necessity of such a release