Jaspreet and Jaswanth Kaur Sidhu have filed a multimillion‑dollar lawsuit against Peel Regional Police, alleging the force failed to warn them of a credible threat that led to their parents’ deaths. Jagtar Sidhu and Harbhajan Sidhu were shot dead in their Caledon, Ontario home in November 2023, an incident police later tied to former Olympic snowboarder Ryan Wedding.

November 2023 Caledon shooting that killed Jagtar and Harbhajan Sidhu

The fatal gunfire occurred on a quiet evening in Caledon, a suburb of Toronto, when officers responded to a domestic‑violence call that turned into a mistaken‑identity homicide.. According to the police report, the assailant was believed to be tagreting another individual, but the Sidhu couple was caught in the crossfire.

Ryan Wedding’s alleged connection to the attack

Investigators have linked the shooting to Ryan Wedding, a former Canadian Olympic snowboarder who was under police surveillance for unrelated matters . as reported by the source, authorities say Wedding’s involvement stemmed from a personal vendetta that was misdirected toward the Sidhu family.

Family’s claim of police negligence and missed warning

The Sidhu siblings assert that Peel Regional Police knew of a credible threat to their parents but failed to issue a protective warning. They argue that, had the police acted, Jagtar and Harbhajan Sidhu would still be alive. The lawsuit cites specific police communications from October 2023 that allegedly indicated an imminent danger.

Legal demands and potential financial exposure for Peel Police

The complaint seeks several million dollars in damages, citing wrongful death, negligence, and emotional distress. If the court finds Peel Regional Police liable , the financial repercussions could set a precedent for how Canadian law‑enforcement agencies handle threat intelligence.

Who remains unaccounted for in the investigation?

While the source confirms Wedding’s suspected role , it does not disclose whether any other individuals were charged or if the police have identified the source of the original threat. The absence of this information leaves a gap in the public’s understanding of the full scope of the case.