Kentucky Lawmakers Weigh Reforms to Sports Betting, DFS, Prediction Markets In one sweeping bill, Kentucky proposes raising its sports betting age, banning college player props, regulating DFS, and taxing prediction markets. In one sweeping bill, Kentucky proposes raising its sports betting age, banning college player props, regulating DFS, and taxing prediction markets.Kentucky is one of more than a dozen states that have considered changing its sports betting regulations this year. The growth of online sportsbooks, along with other sports betting-adjacent industries, all but assures legislative action is just beginning.Kentucky’s sports betting bill would raise the legal age from 18 to 21 and ban in-state college player prop bets. The legislation would regulate daily fantasy “plus” games, fixed-odds horse racing, and introduce taxation for prediction markets. Unregulated prediction markets would be banned, affecting major operators like FanDuel, DraftKings, and Fanatics, though legal challenges may delay enforcement. A Kentucky Senate committee last week received a wide-ranging gaming bill passed overwhelmingly by the House days earlier. There’s no timeline for further action, but the bipartisan House vote - and growing interest in making changes to existing sports betting rules - gives Kentucky’s sweeping bill increasing chances of passage.'s minimum age from 18 to 21, aligning it with most of the other 39 states with regulated sportsbooks. Kentucky is the most populated of the five states that allow betting by users under age 21. If passed, Kentucky’s regulated sportsbooks could no longer offer individual player prop bets on games involving state universities. This would preclude bets on individual points scored or yards receiving for University of Kentucky or University of Louisville student-athletes, for example. Individual player prop bans have been a legislative priority of the NCAA. A handful of states have considered restrictions, but few have acted; Washington lawmakers this yearThe bill would not increase Kentucky’s tax on online sportsbooks' gross gaming revenue, which, at 14.25%, is around the country’s median average. At least a half-dozen state legislatures or governors have proposed sports betting tax increases this year after roughly that many approved increases the year prior.The sweeping Kentucky bill comes as politicians in statehouses across the country are grappling with rapidly changing gambling expansions. Legal sportsbooks have accepted more than $650 billion since the Supreme Court struck down the federal wagering ban in 2018. Nearing a decade of legal betting, a growing number of policymakers are looking to a combination of tax increases and regulatory changes to generate new revenues while offering customer safeguards. Elected officials have also had to contend with a growing number of new offerings that have sprung up since legal sports betting began. In Kentucky, the sports betting regulation bill introduced this year would regulate the new generation of daily fantasy sports “plus” games popularized by brands such as Underdog and PrizePicks as well as offer fixed-odds horse racing., proposing the same 14.25% levy as sportsbooks. The bill would also ban sportsbook companies that offer unregulated prediction market sports event contracts, one of the first states to introduce such statutory language. If passed, that means FanDuel, DraftKings and Fanatics, all of which offer both prediction markets and sports betting platforms, would run afoul of Kentucky law. The three companies combine for more than 75% of the state’s sports betting revenue. Even if passed, the bill would be years from taking effect. Prediction markets have maintained they are not subject to state laws, arguing that position across more than 20 active legal challenges in courtrooms nationwide. The final legal status for these operators likely won’t be determined until the Supreme Court makes a decision, which is unlikely until 2027 or 2028. It remains to be seen what impact Kentucky’s range of proposals would have on the industry if the current proposal passes. But the importance of the full scope of online gaming has become increasingly clear with the legislative momentum in a growing number of states. Ryan is a Senior Editor at Covers reporting on gaming industry legislative, regulatory, corporate, and financial news. He has reported on gaming since the Supreme Court struck down the federal sports wagering ban in 2018. Based in Tampa, Ryan graduated from the University of Florida with a major in Journalism and a minor in Sport Management. Before reporting on gaming, Ryan was a sports and political journalist in Florida and Virginia. He covered Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine and the rest of the Virginia Congressional delegation during the 2016 election cycle. He also worked as Sports Editor of the Chiefland Citizen and Digital Editor for the Sarasota Observer.Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved. If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.