California Faces Federal Scrutiny Over Alleged Non‑Citizen Votes
Federal prosecutors are demanding that California counties verify ballots likely belonging to non‑citizens, intensifying a legal battle with the Department of Justice over election integrity amid conc
California Faces Federal Scrutiny Over Alleged Non‑Citizen Votes Federal prosecutors are demanding that California counties verify ballots likely belonging to non‑citizens, intensifying a legal battle with the Department of Justice over election integrity amid concerns of disenfranchisement and delayed certification. On Friday, federal prosecutors sent formal letters to county election officials throughout California demanding that they temporarily set aside and verify ballots that the Department of Justice has flagged as potentially belonging to non‑citizens. The notices, which arrived on October 16, 2026, are part of an escalating legal confrontation between the state and President Donald Trump's Department of Justice, which has been aggressively pursuing a campaign to identify and exclude non‑citizen voters ahead of the federal midterm elections. The letters come after a lawsuit filed by the federal government that targeted Los Angeles County and the California Secretary of State's office, seeking to stop the counting of roughly 20,000 votes that the Justice Department deems likely to have been cast by people who are not U.S. citizens.DOJ Demands Voter Data From CountiesA hearing on the case is scheduled for the following Tuesday, and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has been asked to expedite a ruling that would keep a lower‑court decision from being delayed. The DOJ's demand is that all counties that have received a similar notice have 48 hours to submit a list of identifying information-such as social security numbers, ID data, and registration copies-for voters it suspects are non‑citizen.It also requests that ballots whose citizenship status cannot be verified be sealed or otherwise set aside. State officials and election lawyers have characterized the federal push as an attempt that could undermine the timely certification of California's election results. They argue that the DOJ's data is unreliable and that the procedures requested could disenfranchise genuine citizens, adding that the process may unfairly delay vote counting.California's secretary of state and the Los Angeles County registrar have both publicly opposed the demands, citing concerns over legal jeopardy for election officials who inadvertently process non‑citizen ballots, while also stressing that the violence and fraud described by the DOJ are rare, difficult to confirm, and have historically not altered election outcomes. The DOJ's letter specifically name‑checks over a thousand individuals from San Bernardino County as suspected non‑citizen voters, providing a list of alleged voters that includes name, address, date of birth, and other data points.Prosecutors Charge Individuals With FraudIt further states that 28 individuals from the broader list of 20,000 alleged non‑citizen voters have been charged with fraudulent registration and, in some cases, illegal voting and falsification of naturalization documents-a move that prosecutors say could lead to years in prison. The letter serves as a formal request for cooperation from local election offices, urging them to provide any information that might confirm or deny the DOJ's allegations.California's more than 23 million registered voters received mail ballots earlier this month, and more than 330,000 mail‑in ballots have already been counted according to the state's filings. The legal dispute reaches a critical point as the federal government continues to push for verification procedures, while the state seeks to protect the integrity of its electoral process and avoid disenfranchisement of lawful voters.Case Sets National Election PrecedentThe outcome of this tug‑of‑war will likely set a precedent for how election authorities across the country handle allegations of non‑citizen voting in the near future.
Original source:
Head Topics
Comments 0