Asana is addressing a growing concern in the software industry: the potential for generative AI to disrupt traditional SaaS tools. Investors have expressed anxieties, reflected in a more than 50% decrease in Asana’s share price this year, questioning whether AI agents could replace applications like Asana.

The Coordination Challenge with AI

Asana CEO Dan Rogers acknowledges the disruption but believes it ultimately strengthens the company’s position. “With AI and AI agents, the coordination problem doesn’t go away. It actually expands exponentially,” Rogers stated in a recent interview.

He envisions a future, dubbed “AgentPalooza,” where numerous AI agents operate within organizations. Without a central management system, Rogers argues, work will become increasingly chaotic. Asana aims to become that central system.

Repositioning as an Orchestration Layer

Asana is shifting its focus from a traditional SaaS application to an “orchestration layer” for both humans and AI agents. The company’s core “work graph”—a data model mapping tasks, workflows, and responsibilities—is being redefined as the infrastructure for this new hybrid workforce.

Increased Complexity and a New Pricing Model

Arnab Bose, Asana’s Chief Product Officer, notes that the initial impact of AI in enterprises has been to increase workload complexity. “People are getting longer, more complicated documents to review,” he explained, referencing the need for increased oversight of AI-generated outputs.

To adapt to this changing landscape, Asana is transitioning from a seat-based pricing model to a hybrid approach incorporating consumption-based charges tied to AI usage. Rogers emphasized customers desire both predictability and value-based pricing.

The company is incorporating elements of both seat-based pricing for “knowability” and new structures that account for AI token usage and outcomes achieved through AI-powered services. New products, AI Teammates and AI Studio, are already monetized this way and are experiencing rapid growth, with AI offerings projected to contribute roughly 15% of annual recurring revenue by the 2027 fiscal year.

Industry Implications and Open Ecosystem

Rogers acknowledges that gross margins for AI-native companies tend to be lower, suggesting a potential structural shift in SaaS profitability. However, Asana is adopting an open approach, encouraging integration of third-party agents, even from competitors.

Bose believes integrating with platforms like Anthropic’s Cowork will enhance Asana’s utility, making it the central hub for tracking and coordinating work, regardless of whether it’s performed by humans or AI agents. This strategy aims to increase platform “stickiness” and integration within user workflows.

Investor Sentiment and Future Outlook

Despite Asana’s strategy, investors remain cautious. Concerns about slowing growth and competition persist. Rogers attributes this to a broader “risk-off” phase in the market as investors assess AI winners and losers.

Recently, RBC Capital Markets upgraded Asana to “market perform” following meetings with company executives. Analysts noted that Asana’s positioning as a coordination layer for agents and workflows differentiates it from competitors.

Sign up for BI's Tech Memo newsletter here. Reach out to me via email at abarr@businessinsider.com.