In a landmark decision, a Texas state judge granted a temporary injunction that blocks the NCAA’s permanent ban on Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby. The ruling, announced Tuesday, means Sorsby can return to play in the 2026 season after admitting to placing over 9,000 bets worth $90,000 during his college career.

Judge’s Ruling Hinges on Potential Irreparable Harm to Sorsby

According to the court filing, the judge found that preventing Sorsby from playing would cause him “probable, imminent and irreparable injury.” The decision was based on the premise that a permanent ban could severely damage the athlete’s future prospects and mental health.. the court’s order also requires Sorsby to continue addiction treatment, participate in recovery programs, and submit regular compliance reports to the NCAA .

Gambling Admission: 9,000 Bets, $90,000 Wagered

The NCAA’s case rested on Sorsby’s admission that he had placed more than 9,000 bets totaling $90,000 over his college career. The organization argued that such conduct threatens the integrity of college sports and that permanent bans are the standard response for athletes who wager on their sport. Sorsby’s legal team countered that he never bet on games he played, never manipulated outcomes, and that his gambling disorder is a medical condition requiring support,not punishment.

Temporary Relief Includes Two‑Game Suspension

While the injunction allows Sorsby to play, the court mandated a two‑game suspension as part of the temporary relief. The suspension is intended to signal the seriousness of the violation while still giving the athlete a chance to rehabilitate. The NCAA has signaled it may pursue further legal action, but the injunction remains in effect pending a full trial.

Unanswered Questions About the NCAA’s Next Move

Key questions remain: Will the NCAA seek a permanent injunction to override the temporary order? How will Texas Tech and the Big 12 respond to Sorsby’s return? And what will the long‑term impact be on NCAA policy regarding gambling violations and mental health considerations? The court’s decision opens a new legal precedent that could influence future cases involving athletes with gambling disorders.

According to the court’s filing, the injuunction is contingent on Sorsby’s compliance with treatment and reporting requirements. The NCAA’s stance, as reported, is that it will continue to consider additional legal options if the athlete fails to meet these conditions.