New England Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs is currently managing two distinct legal disputes involving allegations of sexual assault and strangulation. While one case has ended in a not-guilty verdict, a separate civil matter involving a former acquaintance continues to move through the court system.

Christopher Blake Griffith's claims of drug-laced candy

The most pressing legal challenge for Stefon Diggs involves a sexual assault accusation brought forward by Christopher Blake Griffith. According to the report, Griffith alleges that after the two attended a basketball game in 2023, Diggs provided him with candy laced with drugs at his residence before sexually assaulting him. This case has become a battle of credibility, with Griffith's legal team asserting that the claims are not a "fairy tale" and further alleging that Diggs' brother engaged in violent attacks against Griffith.

The presiding judge has expressed dissatisfaction with the clarity of the defense's responses. As reported, the judge has ordered Stefon Diggs to provide "truthful, complete, and non-evasive responses" regarding the exact nature of his relationship with Christopher Blake Griffith. Specifically, the court is seeking a detailed account of who else was present at the home during the alleged 2023 incident and a full disclosure of the interactions between the two men at that time .

The May 5 acquittal in the chef's strangulation claim

In a separate legal victory,Stefon Diggs was cleared of charges related to the strangulation of his former personal chef. The accusation stemmed from a dispute over unpaid wages that allegedly occurred in December 2025. Following a trial, a jury deliberated for roughly 90 minutes before returning a not-guilty verdict on May 5.

The legal team for Stefon Diggs characterized the accusation as a form of "opportunistic targeting," suggesting that high-profile NFL players are often targeted for lawsuits the moment they leave the field. Following this legal resolution, Stefon Diggs returned to action on January 4, recording 43 receiving yards in a 38-10 victory for the New England Patriots over the Miami Dolphins.

Cardi B's contradictions and the pattern of abuse claims

Adding a layer of complexity to the legal narrative are public statements made by rapper Cardi B, who is the girlfriend of Stefon Diggs. In a video posted on May 11, Cardi B offered a confusing blend of support and condemnation. while she is linked to the athlete, she claimed that the same person who abused her also abused another woman during her pregnancy, alleging that text messages exist showing how Stefon Diggs belittled and spoke to her.

This public admission reflects a broader , recurring trend in professional sports where legal acquittals do not necessarily erase a pattern of behavioral concerns. When public figures like Cardi B suggest a history of emotional or physical abuse, it creates a reputational deficit that a "not guilty" verdict in a specific criminal case cannot fully repair . The juxtaposition of a legal win and a partner's public airing of grievances places Stefon Diggs in a precarious position with the New England Patriots organization and its fanbase.

The fight over Stefon Diggs' professional contract access

A significant point of contention in the ongoing litigation with Christopher Blake Griffith is the accessibility of financial records. Stefon Diggs has filed a motion to block Griffith from accessing his professional football contract, a document Griffith requested to help determine the scale of potential damages.

Several critical questions remain unanswered in this case.. It is still unclear exactly which controlled substances were allegedly used in the "laced candy ," as the judge has noted that Stefon Diggs is not required to answer questions regarding the prior possession or distribution of such substances. Furthermore , the court has yet to establish the precise nature of the relationship between Stefon Diggs and Christopher Blake Griffith, as the athlete initially described the man merely as an acquaintance.