The White House recently removed Kacey Musgraves' track "Mexico Honey" from a video promoting ICE immigration enforcement. The clip, featuring footage of detainees, disappeared only two days after it was first posted.
The Ariana Grande and Olivia Rodrigo precedent
The use of unauthorized music by ICE appears to be a recurring strategy for the agency's social media presence. As Billboard reported, this incident mirrors previous controversies involving other major pop stars. In November, Olivia Rodrigo publicly criticized the White House for using "All American Bitch" without her permission, while Ariana Grande expressed similar anger in June when the agency used her 2024 track "Bye" to promote arrests.
These instances suggest a pattern where the agency attempts to leverage the popularity of contemporary hits to frame its enforcement narratives, often without the artists' consent. By using trending audio, the agency may be attempting to reach a younger, social-media-savvy demographic through familiar cultural touchstones.
A jarring contrast in the 'Mexico Honey' deportation clip
The video in question utilized footage of men being handcuffed and moved onto planes, accompanied by the text "Criminal illegals are going back home ." This heavy imagery was paired with Musgraves' "Mexico Honey," a song that peaked at No. 39 on the Billboard Hot 100 and celebrates romantic infatuation. the track features lyrics such as, "You're going down smooth like Mexico, honey/ Take my heart, take all my money."
According to the report,the video's caption even attempted to link the two by stating "Goin back smooth," a nod to the song's lyrics. This attempt to blend a "breezy tune" with the visual of mass deportations has created a significant aesthetic and political clash, juxtaposing a song about irresistible love with the grim reality of immigration enforcement.
Musgraves' vocal opposition to ICE enforcement tactics
Kacey Musgraves has frequently used her platform to challenge the administration's immigration sweeps and enforcement methods. In June 2025, she used X to criticize the use of identity-concealing masks by ICE officers,arguing that protesters should not be subject to more restrictions than law enforcement. Musgraves' recent criticism of former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem further underscores her distance from the current administration's policy direction.
She has also been a staunch supporter of the Gámez-Cuéllar brothers—Antonio, Caleb, and Joshua—who were detained in Texas for nearly two weeks before their release in March. This support came amid significant public pushback against the administration's aggressive tactics. Her advocacy highlights the growing tension between high-profile entertainers and federal immigration authorities.
Political tensions in the Texas Senate race
The controversy surrounding Musgraves' music arrives amidst a heated political landscape in Texas. The singer recently drew fire from Kristi Noem after welcoming Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico to one of her shows. Talarico, a frequent critic of the administration, is currently navigating a race against the Republican nominee, Ken Paxton.
This election is taking place as voters weigh the economic impact of the administration's unprovoked war with Iran and the high cost of living. The intersection of celebrity influence and immigration policy is becoming increasingly prominent in the national discourse as the midterm elections approach.
Who authorized the use of the Billboard hit?
Despite the video remaining online with a "this sound isn't available" caption, several details of the incident remain unverified. It is currently unclear if Musgraves personally demanded the removal of her music or if the White House acted independently to avoid further backlash. Furthermore, an ICE spokesperson has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the initial use of the track.
The absence of a public statement from Musgraves leaves the exact catalyst for the removal a matter of speculation. Whether the removal was a response to a legal threat or a tactical retreat remains one of the primary unanswered questions of this controversy.
Comments 0