On June 2024 , former Fox News anchor Meg Megyn Kelly publicly defended former President Donald Trump after he abruptly left an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press host Kristen Welker. Kelly said the exchange turned hostile when Welker pressed Trump on his repeated assertions that the 2020 election was stolen, prompting the president to storm out and call her a liar .

Trump’s abrupt exit from Meet the Press on June 2024

During the live interview, Kristen Welker asked Trump for evidence to back his claim that the 2020 election was “rigged.” When the former president could not produce proof, he snapped, calling Welker a liar and walking out of the studio. The moment quickly went viral, sparking debate over whether the president’s reaction was a tactical retreat or an admission of defeat. As the clip circulated, Kelly seized the opportunity to frame the incident as a symptom of broader media dynamics.

Megyn Kelly defends Trump’s walk‑out, blames journalistic pressure

Kelly told SiriusXM listeners that Welker “made that moment about herself” and “refused to stop battering the President.” She argued that journalists feel compelled to “take every point on” that Trump makes, otherwise they risk being labeled election deniers. According to Kelly, the pressure to challenge Trump’s narratives leaves interviewers vulnerable to accusations of bias,a claim she repeated twice in the broadcast.

Welker’s line of questioning on 2020 election claims

Kristen Welker, a veteran of Meet the Press, has long pursued accountability for election misinformation.. In this interview, she demanded concrete evidence for Trump’s allegation that the 2020 vote was stolen, a request that aligns with NBC’s editorial standards. The host’s insistence on proof reflects a broader newsroom trend to fact‑check high‑profile figures. However, Kelly suggested that Welker’s approach “undermined her own credibillity,” implying that the journalist’s tactics backfired.

Unverified claim about Spencer Pratt’s mayoral drop

Kelly also seized the moment to criticize Welker for not highlighting a separate controversy: the decline of Spencer Pratt to third place in the Los Angeles mayoral race, which Kelly described as “a serious scandal.” This allegation remains unverified, and no evidence was presented linking Pratt’s performance to the interview. By bringing up an unrelated local election, Kelly expanded the narrative beyond the Trump‑Welker exchange, suggesting a pattern of selective scrutiny in the media.

Who remains silent on the interview’s fallout?

While Kelly and Trump have voiced their perspectives, the article does not include comments from NBC executives or other journalists who observed the interview. Without statements from the network or independent media analysts, the full impact of the walk‑out on public trust remains unclear. The lack of a broader response leaves readers to wonder whether the incident will influence future interview strategies at major news outlets.