In the latest King’s Speech, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that Labour will introduce a Draft Conversion Practices Bill for England and Wales, fulfilling a manifesto promise to ban conversion therapy. The proposal seeks to criminalise any practice intended to alter a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity, but critics warn it could inadvertently target parents, doctors and religious counselors.

Draft Conversion Practices Bill targets "abuse" in England and Wales

The bill, set to be published for pre‑legislative scrutiny, will apply only to England and Wales because criminal law is devolved elsewhere in the UK. Officials say the legislation is "balanced and targeted" to protect vulnerable people while preserving legitimate healthcare and religious freedom.. As the government explained, the law will "ensure that the criminal law offers protection from these practices,while also preserving the freedom for people".

Labour’s manifesto pledge finally materialises after years of delay

Labour’s commitment dates back to the 2024 election platform, promising a "full trans‑inclusive ban" on conversion practices. Previous Conservative attempts under Theresa May in 2018 stalled, and the transgender component was dropped by Boris Johnson in 2022. the current push reflects Sir Keir Starmer’s long‑term goal to finally codify the ban, despite lingering doubts about its necessity.

Critics fear criminalisation of parental guidance and medical care

Opponents argue that existing laws already outlaw abusive "gay cure" therapies, and the new bill could criminalise routine conversations between parents and children or therapeutic support for gender‑questioning youth. Dr Hilary Cass warned that the ban might "frighten" clinicians away from working with young people seeking gender‑affirming care. Kate Barker of the LGB Alliance warned the legislation could create an "affirmation‑only" framework that shuts down lawful therapeutic exploration.

Religious groups warn the bill could curb freedom of belief

Joanna Timm of The Christian Institute cautioned that the ban might be used to criminalise individuals who disagree with LGBTQ+ activism, noting that "there are already robust protections in law against abuse and coercion." She cited examples such as a mother advising her daughter against a double mastectomy or a pastor praying with a congregant, which could become illegal under a broad interpretation.

What remains unclear about enforcement and scope

Key unanswered points include how auhtorities will differentiate between "abusive" practices and legitimate counseling, and whether the bill will include safeguards for medical professionals. the government has pledged pre‑legislative scrutiny, but as of now no detailed guidance has been released. Stakeholders from health, faith and advocacy groups are awaiting clearer definitions before the bill moves to Parliament.