Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, a Democrat from Washington, has come under scrutiny following inconsistencies in her financial disclosure reports. While the lawmaker has been a vocal proponent of banning members of Congress from trading individual stocks, her filings show shifting holdings in companies such as Amazon, Tesla, and Apple.
The Conflict Between Perez's Stock Ban Advocacy and Her Reported Omissions
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez has built a political platform around the idea that serving in Congress should be about public service rather than personal enrichment. She has repeatedly called for a ban on individual stock trading for members of Congress and their spouses, arguing that such a move would ensure lawmakers remain accountable to their constituents. As the source reports, Perez has even criticized other members of Congress for failing to comply with existing disclosure requirements.
This stance places her in a delicate position regarding her own financial history. While she maintains that she does not trade stocks herself to avoid conflicts, her disclosure history reveals a series of amendments and omissions that complicate this narrative. The discrepancies involve several major tech entities and brokerage platforms, raising questions about the accuracy of her reporting during her transition from candidate to seated official.
The Disappearance of Robinhood and the Late Arrival of Tesla
Financial records show a notable shift in assets between Perez's initial 2022 candidate disclosure and her subsequent filings. In her June 15, 2022, report, Perez disclosed owning between $1,001 and $15,000 in Robinhood Markets stock, along with associated capital gains. However, according to the report, this Robinhood holding completely vanished from her amended candidate disclosure filed on February 21, 2023.
The same February 2023 amendment introducd new assets that were absent from her original June 2022 filing. specifically, Perez listed holdings in Amazon and Tesla, each valued between $1,001 and $15,000. While the Tesla position included reported capital gains and dividends, the Amazon position did not list any such income at that time. These shifts in reported assets highlight a lack of continuity in her financial documentation during her first year in office.
Unexplained Apple Gains and the Missing Amazon Sale Records
The inconsistencies extend to how capital gains are reported relative to the underlying assets. In a new-filer report submitted on May 15, 2023, Perez disclosed capital gains of between $201 and $1,000 from Apple stock during the 2022 calendar year. Despite this income, Apple had not appeared as an asset on either her original June 2022 candidate report or her February 2023 amended report.
Furthermore, the reporting of Amazon stock has created a significant gap in the public record.. While the February 2023 amendment listed an Amazon position worth up to $15,000, this asset failed to appear in her subsequent annual member financial disclosures for 2023 and 2024. The records cited in the report do not inclue a periodic transaction report (PTR), which the House Ethics Committee requires for reportable sales exceeding $1,000.
The Unanswered Question of the Amazon Stock's Current Status
The lack of documentation leaves two primary possibilities regarding the fate of Perez's Amazon holdings. One possibility is that Perez sold the Amazon shares, but failed to file the required periodic transaction report within the 45-day window mandated by the STOCK Act. If a sale did occur,the absence of a PTR represents a failure to comply with the very transparency rules Perez advocates for.
The second possibility is that Perez still holds the Amazon stock, but failed to list the position on her 2023 and 2024 annual disclosures. House Ethics guidance requires that investment assets exceeding $1,000 at the end of a reporting period be disclosed. Without a clear transaction record or a consistent annual listing, the current status of the Amazon position remains an unresolved matter for ethics observers.
Comments 0