Democratic gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra recently discussed California’s pressing issues – affordability, housing, and homelessness – and his vision for the state. The conversation also addressed his record concerning police misconduct records and transparency.

Becerra's Assessment of California's Challenges

During a virtual discussion, I spoke with Xavier Becerra, a candidate for Governor of California. Becerra previously served as California’s Attorney General from 2017 to 2021 and as the Secretary of Health and Human Services under President Joe Biden from 2021 to 2025. He also held positions in the California State Assembly (1990-1992) and the U.S. House of Representatives (1993-2017).

The discussion began with questions about the perceived failures of Democratic governance in California. Becerra maintained that Democrats have largely been successful, citing improvements in living wages as evidence of progress. He acknowledged instances where the party “got ahead of our skis” with ambitious agendas, but emphasized a continued commitment to inclusivity.

Addressing Key Issues

Despite acknowledging crises in affordability, housing, and homelessness, Becerra attributed high gas prices to the policies of former Republican President Donald Trump. He also stated that the state gas tax was not the primary driver of high prices. However, he did not directly address the other critical issues facing Californians.

California currently has the highest gas tax in the nation, contributing to the overall cost at the pump.

Controversy Surrounding The Right To Know Act

The conversation then turned to Becerra’s actions regarding The Right To Know Act of 2019, which mandated the public disclosure of police misconduct records, including allegations of sexual assault and excessive force.

Opposition to Record Release

I questioned Becerra about his opposition to the release of these records and allegations of threats against journalists who obtained them. Becerra explained his actions as a pursuit of legal clarification and a need to protect privacy. However, records show he actively appealed court rulings in favor of disclosure, seeking to overturn them.

Concerns Over Transparency

When pressed about the alleged threats to journalists, Becerra claimed he was simply informing them of the law. This explanation did not fully address concerns that his actions were intended to silence investigative reporting and obstruct public access to information regarding police accountability. The Right To Know Act was intended to increase accountability and transparency within law enforcement.

In conclusion, the discussion revealed a candidate navigating a narrative of past success while acknowledging California’s significant challenges. Becerra’s responses often deflected blame and downplayed the role of Democratic policies in the state’s current situation. His stance on The Right To Know Act also raised questions about his commitment to transparency and public accountability.