Arizona congressional candidate Joanna Mendoza is under scrutiny for continuing to accept support from Senator Ruben Gallego and a political action committee (PAC) connected to former Representative Eric Swalwell, despite serious allegations of sexual misconduct against Swalwell.

Allegations Against Eric Swalwell

The allegations stem from accusations made by Lonna Drewes, a model and businesswoman, who claims she was sexually assaulted by Swalwell in 2018. Drewes alleges a series of encounters culminated in an assault in Swalwell’s hotel room, where she believes she was drugged and lost consciousness.

Drewes' Account

Drewes recounts being raped and choked, explicitly stating she did not consent to any sexual activity. While she did not undergo a forensic examination at the time, Drewes says she disclosed the assault to friends and documented it in her calendar. Swalwell resigned from Congress following the emergence of these allegations.

Gallego's Involvement and Response

Senator Ruben Gallego initially supported Swalwell but later withdrew his endorsement in response to the accusations. However, Gallego is now facing scrutiny and allegations of inappropriate behavior himself.

Mendoza's Silence Fuels Criticism

When questioned about her stance on the endorsements, Mendoza remained silent, refusing to address the concerns raised. She was asked if she still valued Gallego’s support, given his relationship with Swalwell, and if she was aware of allegations against Gallego.

Mendoza had previously acknowledged and celebrated the endorsement from Future Forum PAC, praising its dedication to empowering future leaders. Her silence is fueling criticism, with opponents suggesting she prioritizes political expediency over addressing legitimate concerns.

Broader Political Context

The case unfolds amid heightened political awareness regarding redistricting efforts and their impact on elections. Recent votes in Virginia and cautions from Democratic leaders highlight a politically charged environment where scrutiny of candidates and their associations is intense.

The ongoing review of information regarding Gallego, initiated by Senate officials, adds another layer of complexity. The lack of transparency from Mendoza amplifies concerns about her judgment and commitment to ethical conduct.