The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) has released a controversial political advertisement targeting Democratic U.S. House candidate Jamie Ager in North Carolina. The ad uses AI-generated imagery and makes unverified claims regarding a "drag queen barn dance" and a $5,000 donation to Blue Ridge Pride.
The non-consensual AI likeness of Jamie Ager
The NRCC's use of artificial intelligence to depict Jamie Ager has moved beyond mere political messaging into a significant legal gray area. According to the report, the North Carolina Department of Justice has launched an investigation into the non-consensual use of a performer's likeness within the advertisement. by using AI to generate a video of Ager claiming a need for "barn dances" in Washington, D.C., the NRCC has set a precedent for how technology can be used to manufacture false statements from political opponents.
Critics have noted that the NRCC has continued to utilize the AI-generated image of Ager in other parts of its campaign. This persistence highlights a growing tension between modern campaigning techniques and the legal protections afforded to a candidate's own identity and voice.
Blue Ridge Pride’s $5,000 donation dispute
The controversy extends to the financial and organizational claims made against the local LGBTQ organization, Blue Ridge Pride. Madison Root, the board president of Blue Ridge Pride, has characterized the advertisement as "appalling" and warned that the content could be considered libel. The report states that the organization sent a cease-and-desist letter to a Republican representative, noting that their logo was used without permission and that the alleged $5,000 donation from Ager remains unsubstantiated.
Ager's campaign has responded by publicly denying all allegations , describing the NRCC's commercial as a "defamation attack." The dispute centers on whether the ad's attempt to link Ager to specific LGBTQ funding is a legitimate political inquiry or a calculated attempt to mislead voters through falsehoods.
Misidentifying Schlayer and the Beer City Sisters
The advertisement also specifically targeted performers, misidentifying a drag queen known as Schlayer. While the NRCC's ad used names such as "Sister Dominatrix" and "Sister Helen Bedd," the farm associated with Ager, Hickory Nut Gap Farms, defended its relationship with the Beer City Sisters. these performers, who describe themselves as "21st Century nuns dedicated to the promulgation of universal joy," have seen their public image impacted by the political fallout of the ad's claims regarding a 2019 event.
The use of these stage personas in a political context has drawn sharp criticism from local businesses and activists . By associating a family-friendly farm event with controversial political narratives , the NRCC has been accused of using simulated imagery to damage the reputations of both the candidate and the performers involved.
Protests at the state capitol and the #StopAIPropaganda movement
A growing movement of activists is pushing back against these tactics through the #StopAIPropaganda hashtag and physical demonstrations . Protesters gathered outside the North Carolina state capitol to voice opposition to what they term "simulated slander ." This movement reflects a broader, troubling trend in the political economy where the line between aggressive persuasion and outright defamation is increasingly blurred by rapid advancements in generative AI.
Mainstream media outlets have also weighed in, citing the technique as an example of how unrelated, family-friendly events can be weaponized to influence a political campaign. The incident is being viewed by many as a turning point that could influence how future elections are fought in the region.
Who will be held liable for the "simulated slander"?
Several critical questions remain unanswered following the NRCC's release of the advertisement. It is currently unclear how much legal responsibility will fall on North Carolina State Representative Jennifer Balkcom, who is reportedly scheduled to be a co-author of the ad. The investigation by the North Carolina Department of Justice must determine the extent to which the unauthorized use of Schlayer's likeness violates existing state laws.
Furthermore, the veracity of the claims regarding the 2019 barn dance remains a point of intense dispute. As the legal and political fallout continues, the central question remains whether the NRCC can defend the use of AI-generated falsehoods as protected political speech or if it will be held accountable for defamation.
Comments 0