A coroner has determined that HM Treasury's procedural errors contributed to the death of 26-year-old Chloe Moffat. After being confronted with an anonymous complaint, Ms. Moffat ended her life in May last year, fearing immediate dismissal.
The failure to clarify the risk of dismissal
Coroner Anna Crawford concluded that HM Treasury's management failed to provide essential reassurance to Chloe Moffat during a May 19 disciplinary meeting. According to the report, Ms. Moffat, who worked as a personal assistant, was informed of anonymous allegations regarding the sharing of confidential information. During the meeting, which included line manager Kim Aldrich and head of global issues Liz Farmer, Ms. Moffat asked if her job was at risk.. Instead of providing clarity, the senior manager stated she could not predict the outcome.
Ms. Crawford's ruling emphasized that the Treasury should have informed Ms. Moffat that even if the allegations were proven, the likely sanction would be a written warning rather than dismissal. This lack of transparency regarding the potential disciplinary outcome is what the coroner identified as a material contribution to Ms. Moffat's death. The report notes that Ms. Moffat left the meeting feeling devastated and convinced her employment was ending, even sending a text to a friend stating, "I am going to be fired."
An unblemished record and an unreceived bonus
Chloe Moffat had miantained an unblemished employment record at the Treasury for three years prior to the incident. Her mother, Anna Moffat, told The Times that her daughter was "happy as Larry" and was actually on the verge of a promotion. The report highlights that Ms. Moffat had recently been awarded a bonus following an end-of-year review, though she had not yet been notified of this achievement.
The sudden nature of the disciplinary action stood in stark contrast to Ms. Moffat's professional standing. Emails from Treasury directors , as reported by The Times, indicated that she was highly regarded by her superiors. This discrepancy between her positive performance reviews and the sudden, intense scrutiny of an anonymous complaint created a profound sense of distress for the 26-year-old, who subsequently traveled to Godalming,Surrey, to spend time with her parents before her death.
A 'fact-finding' meeting that was already deemed 'serious'
Internal communications at HM Treasury revealed a significant disconnect between the stated purpose of the meeting and the department's actual assessment of the situation. While Treasury staff described the encounter with Ms. Moffat as an informal "fact-finding" session, internal emails showed that the organization had already classified the alleged misconduct as "serious."
The coroner suggested that the meeting's true intent may have been to elicit an admission of guilt to facilitate a formal disciplinary process. This approach bypassed the Treasury's own written Discipline Policy and Procedure. The inquest heard that while the managers, Aldrich and Farmer,were following advice provided by the HR department, that advice failed to align with established company protocols.
The mystery of the flawed HR advice given to managers
Several critical questions remain regarding the internal breakdown of protocol at HM Treasury. While the inquest established that managers followed the instructions of the HR department, the specific individuals within the HR division who provided that advice have not been identified.. It remains unclear why the department's guidance directly contradicted its own written disciplinary policies .
Furthermore, the source does not clarify how an anonymous complaint was allowed to trigger such a high-stakes meeting without the preliminary safeguards suggested by the coroner. There is also no information regarding whether the Treasury has taken disciplinary action against the staff responsible for the procedural failures that led to this tragedy.
Comments 0