Gun-control organizations are urging the RCMP to release detailed information regarding the weapons used in the Tumbler Ridge mass shooting. These groups argue that transparency about the firearms' origins is vital for public safety and legislative reform.
The École Polytechnique legacy driving PolySeSouvient's demands
The push for transparency is led by PolySeSouvient, an advocacy group established after the 1989 École Polytechnique massacre in Montreal. Heidi Rathjen, a survivor of that shooting and a key figure in Canadian gun-control law, is leading the effort to force the RCMP to disclose the make, model, and legal status of the weapons used in Tumbler Ridge. According to the report, PolySeSouvient is joined by other victims' groups, including Angies Angels and the Quebec Mosque,in a letter addressed to RCMP Commissioner Michael Duheme.
This movement reflects a long-standing pattern in Canada where survivors of gun violence seek to turn tragedy into policy change.. By demanding to know if the weapons were prohibited or modified, PolySeSouvient aims to identify specific gaps in the current firearms enforcement regime. The group argues that waiting for a trial or a coroner's inquest to reveal these facts prevents the public from having an informed debate about immediate safety measures.
A modified rifle and the suspected Kriss Vector
The specific nature of the weaponry used in the attack remains a point of contention and mystery. In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, the RCMP stated that investigators were analyzing a shotgun used at a residence, as well as a long gun and a modified rifle seized from the high school. However, further details have only emerged through unofficial channels; a Facebook post by Jennifer Jacobs, the mother of the suspect Jesse Van Rootselaar, identified a weapon believed to be a Kriss Vector.
The lack of official confirmation regarding these weapons is a primary grievance for advocacy groups. As the report notes, PolySeSouvient wants the RCMP to clarify whether any of these firearms had been previously reported as lost or stolen, or if they had been seized by police in the past and subsequently returned to the owner.
Why firearms seized from Jesse Van Rootselaar were returned
One of the most alarming revelations in the case is the history of police interaction with the suspect. The report indicates that firearms had been previously seized from the home of Jesse Van Rootselaar,yet the "main firearm" used in the school shooting had never been taken into police custody. This raises critical questions about the criteria the RCMP uses to return seized weapons to individuals.
Advocacy groups are demanding to know the legal basis upon which those earlier seizures were reversed. If the RCMP had already identified a risk sufficient to seize weapons once, the failure to prevent the acquisition or retention of the school-shooting weapon suggests a systemic breakdown in risk assessment and enforcement.
The tension between Niki Sharma's inquiry and the RCMP's secrecy
There is a clear conflict between the provincial government's desire for accountability and the RCMP's investigative protocols. Attorney General Niki Sharma has announced that the B.C. government will request a public inquiry into the Tumbler Ridge massacre, but this process is currently stalled. The provincial government has stated that the inquiry cannot proceed until the criminal investigation is concluded.
Within the RCMP, there is internal resistance to early disclosure. North District Major Crime Unit Const. Jonathan Paquin has expressed concerns that releasing information too early could prejudice the goals of a potential public inquiry or the coroner's inquest. Meanwhile,B.C. RCMP Staff Sgt. Kris Clark has maintained that timelines for releasing information are "virtually impossible" to predict due to the complexities of an active criminal investigation.
Comments 0