The International Criminal Court (ICC) has suspended its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, following a United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) investigation that found evidence of non‑consensual sexual contact between Khan and a female aide. khan, a 56‑year‑old British barrister, stepped down on Monday after the Assembly of States Parties referred him for disciplinary proceedings. the decision marks the first time the ICC has suspended its chief prosecutor, a move that will be decided by a special session of the Assembly.

Unprecedented Suspension of a ICC Chief Prosecutor

According to the ICC’s own statement, the suspension is based on a comprehensive review that included the OIOS report, legal advice from an ad hoc panel of judicial experts, and written submissions from relevant parties. The Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties emphasized that the suspension is pending the assembly meeting and should not be taken as a final verdict. This unprecedented step underscores the gravity of the allegations and the ICC’s commitment to accountability.

OIOS Findings and the Pattern of Alleged Conduct

The OIOS investigation concluded that Khan had engaged in non‑consensual sexual contact with a female aide in multiple settings, including his office,his private residence, and while on offciial missions. The Associated Press had previously reported whistleblower documents that detail how Khan allegedly moved the aide from another ICC department into his office, invited her to travel with him, and engaged in repeated non‑consensual behavior such as locking the office door and touching her without consent. These allegations paint a pattern of misconduct that the ICC must now adjudicate.

Procedural Complexities and the Role of the Assembly of States Parties

A separate three‑judge panel, selected by the executive committee, found the OIOS findings inconclusive enough to warrant further review. This divergence highlights procedural challenges: the Assembly of States Parties holds the sole constitutional authority to remove Khan from his five‑year term, requiring a majority vote in a secret ballot of all 125 member states. The Assembly has pledged to convene a special session as expeditiously as possible, but no date has yet been set.

Who Will Decide Khan’s Fate?

The final determination rests with the Assembly of States Parties, which will decide whether Khan can retain his leadership role at the global tribunal. The Assembly’s decision will be made by a secret ballot, requiring at least 63 votes in favor of dismissal. Until the Assembly meets, Khan remains suspended, and a formal statement from his legal representative is expected on Tuesday.