A former soldier and truckr named Kevin Minto discovered a rare Roman gold ring in a field near Ilminster, Somerset. The artifact, which depicts the goddess Victory, was acquired by the South West Heritage Trust for over £78,000.
The £78,010 Victory Ring of Ilminster
The artifact discovered by Kevin Minto is a massive gold ring weighing 48 grams, featuring a gemstone engraved with the goddess Victory riding a two-horse chariot. According to the report, Minto, a 68-year-old former soldier, found the piece in 2018 in a Somerset field where he had previously located a hoard of Roman coins.
The financial windfall from the find was significant, as the South West Heritage Trust acquired the ring for 78,010 pounds. This sum, which included the value of the associated coin hoard, was split between Minto and the landowner. Minto reportedly used his share to pay off his mortgage and support a friend, illustrating the life-changing potential of amateur archaeology.
The Fosse Way and the Wealth of South Somerset
The location of the find near Ilminster suggests the ring belonged to a person of immense status. Senior curator Amal Khreisheh suggests the owner may have been a wealthy individual involved in local administration or the owner of a farming estate. This theory is supported by the region's history ,as South Somerset was a prosperous area characterized by Roman villas and the Fosse Way, a critical trade route of the era.
This discovery fits into a broader pattern of Roman settlement in southwest England, where the intersection of agriculture and trade created a class of wealthy provincials. The presence of such a high-value item indicates that the Ilminster area was not merely a rural outpost but a hub of economic activity and administrative power during the Roman occupation.
Burial in 297 AD Amidst Roman Unrest
Archaeological evidence suggests the ring was buried around 297 AD, a date that places the artifact's concealment immediately following a period of significant instability. As the report notes, the region experienced unrest between 286 and 296 AD. The ring was not buried alone; it was found alongside pottery, lead, and coins, suggesting a deliberate cache intended for later recovery.
The act of burying such a valuable object often points to times of crisis, where owners hid their wealth to protect it from raiding parties or political upheaval.. The fact that the ring remained in the Somerset soil for nearly 1,700 years suggests that whoever hid the treasure never returned to claim it.
Who was the original owner of the 48-gram gold ring?
Despite the ring's physical presence, the identity of the person who wore it remains a mystery. While Amal Khreisheh points toward a local administrator or estate owner, there are no inscriptions or records to confirm a specific name. The source mentions that children in local schools are currently speculating about the owner's identity as part of a community engagement program, but a definitive historical identity remains elusive.
Furthermore, it is unclear why this specific piece of jewelry—described as unparalleled in Britain—was chosen for burial alongside more common items like lead and pottery.. Whether it was a family heirloom or a symbol of official office is a question that historians have yet to answer.
From a Coroner's Inquest to Somerset Classrooms
The journey of the ring from the dirt to the museum followed a strict legal path. Under British law,Kevin Minto was required to report the find to local finds liaison officers,which triggered a formal coroner's inquest to determine the item's status as treasure. This process ensures that significant historical finds are handled transparently and that rewards are distributed fairly between the finder and the landowner.
Currently, the South West Heritage Trust is using the ring for educational outreach in schools to spark interest in local history. Once the community program concludes, the ring will be permanently displayed at the Museum of Somerset, ensuring that the craftsmanship of Roman Britain remains accessible to the public.
Comments 0