Model Presley Gerber, 27, passed away on September 20 shortly after checking into Resolutions Living in Santa Monica. A subsequent investigation by state regulators into the facility's overdose protocols cooncluded that no violations occurred.

Advertisement

The September 20 death of Presley Gerber at Resolutions Living

Presley Gerber , a 27-year-old model, died on September 20 after arriving at Resolutions Living, a facility located in Santa Monica. According to the report, Gerber had checked into the center only one night prior to the tragedy. The sudden nature of the death raised immediate concerns regarding the level of supervision and the medical protocols in place at the facility during the intake process.

The incident sparked an immediate inquiry into whether the facility was equipped to handle residents in acute crisis. because Gerber died so soon after arrival,the timeline suggests a critical window where medical intervention might have been necessary, though the state's findings suggest the facility operated within its legal mandate.

Why Resolutions Living avoids state licensure as a 'sober living environment'

A central finding of the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) is that Resolutions Living operates as a "sober living environment" rather than a licensed substance use disorder treatment facility. As reported, this distinction is legally significant because it means the facility does not require state licensure for the specific services it provides to its residents.

This distinction reflects a broader, often contentious trend in the recovery industry where "sober living" homes provide peer support and housing rather than clinical medical care. while licensed treatment centers must adhere to strict medical staffing ratios and emergency protocols, sober living environments are generally viewed as residential supports. This creates a systemic gap where individuals may enter a facility expecting clinical oversight but are instead placed in a non-medical environment.

For the residents of Resolutions Living, this means the facility is not mandated to provide the same level of psychiatric or medical monitoring found in a hospital or a licensed detox center. The DHCS clarified that the program's operations were cosnistent with this lower-tier classification, effectively shielding the facility from the more stringent requirements imposed on medical rehabs.

The DHCS probe triggered by a reform advocate's complaint

The investigation by the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) was not initiated by the family of Presley Gerber,but rather by a complaint from a reform advocate. This advocate suggested that Resolutions Living may have admitted an individual who was actively under the influence or provided clinical care that exceeded the facility's legal authority.

The DHCS reviewed the facility to determine if Resolutions Living was providing services outside its designated scope. However, the investigation concluded that no such violations had occurred.. The report indicates that the facility did not overstep its bounds by attempting to act as a medical clinic , which is why the state found no grounds for disciplinary action or licensure penalties.

The missing details on the cause of death and admission protocols

Despite the DHCS clearance, several critical questions remain unanswered. The source does not specify the official cause of death for Presley Gerber, nor does it detail the specific screening process Resolutions Living uses to determine if a new arrival is too unstable for a non-licensed sober living environment.

Furthermore, it remains unclear if the reform advocate's complaint was based on a pattern of behavior at Resolutions Living or a specific observation regarding the Gerber case. Because the DHCS only looked for "scope of service" violations, the investigation may not have addressed the qualitative adequacy of the care provided, only whether that care fell within the legal definition of a sober living home.