The $30 billion industry's dirty secret

Microplastics are present in 87% of products by ten bestselling cosmetics brands, according to research by the Plastic Soup Foundation (PSF). The EU has intrduced restrictions on intentionally added microplastics in cosmetics, but the industry is resistant to change.

Scientists and campaigners are concerned that microplastics may contribute to cancer development, inflammatory responses, and DNA damage. the PSF points to research that says the smallest particles can penetrate beyond the skin's surface under certain conditions, particularly when the skin barrier is compromised.

What audditors flagged in the May filing

The EU's restrictions on microplastics in cosmetics are a step in the right direction, but scientists and campaigners argue that the rules don't go far enough. The definition of what counts as a microplastic excludes certain liquid and soluble plastic polymers, meaning many commonly used ingredients will remain untouched.

Dr Nicole Chiang, a consultant dermatologist, notes that 'there are many people in the industry who are very resistant to change, who will argue that microplastics are safe, that they're essential for product performance and that the science isn't clear.' However, she believes that 'we need to be more cautious and consider the long-term effects of these ingredients on our skin and our health.'

Who is the unnamed buyer?

The beauty industry must take responsibility for the impact of microplastics on our health and the environment. 'We need to be more transparent and honest about the ingredients we use, and we need to be more proactive in reducing our use of microplastics,' says Dr Chiang.

Consumers can take steps to reduce their exposure to microplastics by choosing products that are free from microplastics, or opting for natural, organic products that use plant-based ingredients. 'You can also check the ingredients list to see if any microplastics are listed,' advises Dr Chiang. 'If you can't find the information , contact the company and ask them to disclose it.'

An echo of Sydney's 2024 institutional buy-up

The issue of microplastics in cosmetics is not new, but it's gaining momentum. In 2021, Greenpeace Italy flagged Lush, Maybelline, and Sephora for particularly high use of microplastics in certain products. The PSF is now calling for greater transparency and action from the industry.

Dr Chiang notes that 'simplifying our routine and choosing fewer heavily processed cosmetic products may help reduce exposure.' However, she believes that 'change is coming, and we need to be more proactive in reducing our use of microplastics.'

What's still unknown

There are still many unanswered questions about the impact of microplastics on our health and the environment. 'We need to be more transparent and honest about the ingredients we use, and we need to be more proactive in reducing our use of microplastics,' says Dr Chiang.

The beauty industry must take responsibility for the impact of microplastics on our health and the environment. 'We need to be more transparent and honest about the ingredients we use,and we need to be more proactive in reducing our use of microplastics,' says Dr Chiang.