ABC’s Dancing With the Stars utilizes a rigorous, manual scoring protocol to maintain fairness during its prime-time broadcasts. while the show is known for its high-glitz performances, the actual point allocation relies on a chain of physical documents and control room verification.

Advertisement

The paper trail from judges' desks to the ABC control room

The scoring integrity of Dancing With the Stars depends on a manual verification process described by producer Joe Sungkur. instead of relying solely on digital inputs, the system begins with a simple piece of paper placed on each judge's desk.

According to the report, judges write their scores down immediately after a routine and hand them to assistants. These assistants then transport the physical notes to a control room where ABC-standard officials compare the written numbers against the paddles used by judges like Bruno Tonioli and Maksim Chmerkovskiy. this redundant check is intended to ensure that the televised numbers match the official records.

The 2016 Nyle DiMarco scoring discrepancy

Even with strict protocols, the production has faced visible mathematical errors on air. A prominent example occurred during a 2016 episode featuring contestants Nyle DiMarco and his professional partner, Sharna Burgess.

During that broadcast, the official tally for the couple was 37 out of 40, yet the physical paddles held by judges Bruno Tonioli and Maksim Chmerkovskiy only indicated a total of 20 points. As the report notes , DiMarco had to clarify to the studio audience that the system's digital input is the final authority, while the paddles serve as a secondary, sometimes inaccurate, reflection of those numbers.

Karina Smirnoff’s low-scoring early seasons

The show's scoring history is not always defined by perfection, as evidenced by the early struggles of professional dancer Karina Smirnoff . In her early years on the series, Smirnoff frequently found herslf at the bottom of the leaderboard.

Smirnoff has noted that her scores in those early seasons often sat in the low teens, specifically citing marks of 10, 12, and 13. Despite these low nmubers,her partnerships—including one with an unnamed Apple co-founder—helped build the show's early momentum through high-energy routines and personality-driven drama.

The unnamed Season 35 controversy and missing details

While the production team emphasizes its comitment to fairness, several details from the show's recent history remain unaddressed in the current reporting. Specifically, the report mentions a significant event from Season 35 that became a major talking point, yet it fails to specify the nature of the controversy.

Furthermore,the source mentions a partnership between Karina Smirnoff and an Apple co-founder but does not identify the celebrity involved. Without these specific names and descriptions, viewers are left to speculate on the exact circumstances of these past televised moments.