Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim have relesed You Can See Everything, a documentary capturing Elizabeth Holmes before her incarceration. The film provides a rare look at the former Theranos CEO and her family during a critical window of time.
34 Days Before an 11-Year Sentence
The production of You Can See Everything centered on a concentrated 34-day window where Nathan Fielder and co-director Lance Oppenheim gained access to Elizabeth Holmes. This period occurred just before the disgraced Theranos founder began serving an 11-year prison sentence for fraud. According to the report, the resulting film runs for 2 hours and 54 minutes, offering an intimate, if unsettling, portrait of Holmes alongside her partner, Billy Evans, and their young children.
This specific timeframe transforms the film into a countdown, heightening the tension as the audience knows the inevitable conclusion awaiting Elizabeth Holmes. By focusing on the domestic life of a convicted frauddster in her final days of freedom, Nathan Fielder shifts the narrative away from the corporate boardroom and into the psychological space of a woman facing the consequences of a massive deception.
Billy Evans and the Hotel Heir's Role
While Elizabeth Holmes is the primary subject, the documentary introduces Billy Evans, a hotel heir and the father of Holmes' two children, as a pivotal figure. as the report notes, Billy Evans emerges as a perceived villain within the narrative of You Can See Everything. The film explores the dynamics of their relationship and Evans' own background, adding a layer of interpersonal conflict to the broader story of corporate fraud.
The inclusion of Billy Evans suggests that Nathan Fielder is interested in the ecosystem of deception. By framing the hotel heir as an antagonist , the film asks whether the traits that allowed Elizabeth Holmes to deceive investors were mirrored or enabled by those closest to her in her private life.
The Dispute Over Paying Elizabeth Holmes
A central source of tension in You Can See Everything is a dispute regarding whether the subjects, including Elizabeth Holmes and Billy Evans, were paid for their participation. Nathan Fielder, known for the boundary-pushing nature of The Rehearsal, integrates this financial disagreement directly into the film's plot. This move turns the act of documentary filmmaking itself into a subject of the movie.
This focus on the "deal" reflects a broader trend in modern non-fiction storytelling where the process of capturing the truth is as important as the truth itself. by highlighting the money trail between the production and the subjects, Nathan Fielder forces the viewer to question the authenticity of the interactions on screen.
A Former Theranos Engineer's Claim of Deception
The authenticity of the film has already been challenged by a former Theranos research engineer who worked closely with Elizabeth Holmes . This individual claims that You Can See Everything is misleading and asserts that the project is "definitely not a documentary." This critique suggests that Nathan Fielder may have employed his signature brand of reality-bending manipulation to elicit responses from Holmes.
This conflict places the film in direct contrast with Alex Gibney's 2019 documentary on Theranos, which focused on the systemic failure and the rise and fall of the startup. While Gibney sought to document a crime, Nathan Fielder appears to be conducting a psychological experiment. This leaves several questions unanswered: to what extent was the footage staged, and did Elizabeth Holmes believe she was participating in a standard documentary or a Fielder-esque performance piece?
Comments 0