Former glamour model Katie Price has taken to her podcast to refute a swirl of rumours surrounding her husband Lee Andrews’ two‑week disappearance and subsequent arrest. In a brief interview, she clarified that the couple’s phone was re‑activated while he was in custody and dismissed claims that he was following another woman online.

Al Awir Central Prison Holds Lee Andrews on Civil Charges, Not Espionage

According to the report, Lee Andrews was arrested on a civil matter and is now being held at the notorious Al Awir Central Prison.. Price denied the sensational claim that he was detained on suspicion of espionage, stating that the allegations were unfounded. The source notes that Andrews had previously told Price he had been kidnapped before going “under the radar” for two weeks.

Phone Re‑Activated During Detention, Not by Andrews Himself

Price explained that the phone’s re‑activation occurred while Andrews was interrogated, not by him. She said the prison staff used the device to communicate with him. This detail counters the narrative that Andrews was actively coordinating his disappearance.

Price’s Emotional Tribute to Amy Amid Mis‑dedicated Song

Price posted an Instagram clip of her singing Brenda Russell’s 1988 ballad “Get Here,” which she claimed was dedicated to her then‑missing husband.. However, the source reveals that the song was originally intended for her mother, Amy , who is 72 and battling a terminal lung condition. Amy’s sister Sophie explained that Price chose the track because it was one of her mother’s favourites, only changing the dedication at the last minute.

Who Is the Unnamed Woman in the Online Rumours?

Price addressed rumours that Andrews had followed another woman online during his disappearance. She stated , “What happened with the woman was she activated her account and she followed him or he followed her. But then she blocked him. They’ve never exchanged messages.” The source does not identify the woman,leaving the story’s specifics unclear.

Open Question:What Evidence Links Andrews to the Alleged Online Interaction?

The report does not provide concrete evidence of Andrews’ online activity,nor does it name the woman involved.. It also fails to confirm whether the phone re‑activation was a standard procedure or a deliberate attempt to mislead the public. These gaps mean the full picture of Andrews’ disappearance remains incomplete.