Emily Ratajkowski posted a series of topless Instagram images on Friday, posing with a baby doll she pretended to breastfeed while holding a martini glass. The pictures, meant to promote her forthcoming essay in The Cut , have drawn a wave of criticism for sexualizing motherhood and for the perceived shock‑value stunt.

Emily Ratajkowski’s Instagram topless doll photo sparks backlash

In the images, the 35‑year‑old model appears topless beneath an open leather jacket, cradling a baby doll and mimicking a nursing pose while sipping wine. Fans quickly labeled the shots “disturbing” and “uncomfortable,” with one comment asking, “Since when do we breastfeed and drink alcohol?” According to the source, the photos were intended to promote her new essay titled “motherf*****” for New York Magazine.

The Cut essay reveals her post‑divorce sex confession

Ratajkowski’s essay, published in The Cut, details a “sex‑filled life” after her 2022 split from husband Sebastian Bear‑McClard, a film producer known for Uncut Gems. She writes that six months after the birth of her son Sylvester, the couple stopped having sex, leading to separation less than a year later. The piece also references a “compulsively dating” phase that saw her linked to high‑profile names.

Celebrity rumors: Brad Pitt, Harry Styles, and Orazio Rispo

The model’s love life has been a tabloid staple since the divorce. Reports claim she sidestepped romance rumors with Brad Pitt, had on‑and‑off flings with DJ Orazio Rispo, and was spotted kissing Harry Styles in Tokyo in March 2023, a moment described by a Daily Mail source as a “betrayal” to Styles’ ex‑girlfriend Olivia Wilde. These rumors,while unverified, illustrate the intense public fascination with her dating choices.

Fans label the image ‘disturbing’ and ‘uncomfortable’

Social‑media users have not been kind. comments range from accusations of “pure ridiculousness” to claims that the stunt reflects “a desperation for attention.” The source notes that many viewers felt the photo crossed a line , questioning whether it qualifies as art or mere provocation.

Is the doll meant as art or provocation?

One lingering question is whether the baby doll is a symbolic critique of motherhood expectations or simply a shock tactic to generate clicks.. The essay’s promotional angle suggests an artistic intent, yet the immediate public reaction leans toward the latter. As the source reports, no clear explanation has been offered by Ratajkowski or her team, leaving the motive open to interpretation.