The U.S. official unemployment rate fell to 4.2% in July, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, the Louis Institute for Socio-Economic Policy (LISEP) reports that its "True Rate of Unemployment" has climbed to 24.9%.

Advertisement

The 20.7% gap between official and true unemployment

The discrepancy between the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Louis Institute for Socio-Economic Policy (LISEP) has reached a critical point. While the BLS reported a decline from the 4.5% seen in November 2023, the LISEP "True Rate of Unemployment" has surged to 24.9% in July. This massive gap highlights a fundamental disagreement on what constitutes "employment" in the modern economy.

The official numbers focus on individuals who are actively seeking work but cannot find it. in contrast, the LISEP metric provides a more granular view by accounting for underemployment and those trapped in poverty-level wages. This suggests that even as the headline jobless rate improves, the actual economic security of the American worker may be deteriorating.

Why the Fed views 4.2% as full employment

The Federal Reserve currently interprets the 4.2% jobless rate as a sign that the economy has reached "full employment." This perspective is rooted in traditional economic modeling, which views low headline unemployment as a signal of a healthy, balanced labor market. From this viewpoint, the recent decline from the 4.5% rate recorded in late 2023 suggests a stabilizing economy.

However, relying solely on the Federal Reserve's interpretation of the BLS data may lead to policy errors. If the "full employment" target is met on paper while a quarter of the population is effectively underemployed, the central bank may be overlooking a growing class of workers who are working but cannot meet basic needs.. This disconnect could result in interest rate decisions that fail to address the actual level of economic distress.

Four months of rising LISEP underemployment figures

The LISEP True Rate of Unemployment has seen four consecutive monthly increases, reaching its current 24.9% level in July. This sustained upward trend indicates that the rise in underemployment is not a seasonal fluctuation or a temporary market correction. Instead, it points to a structural shift in the quality of available jobs.

As the LISEP data suggests, the labor market is increasingly characterized by low-wage roles that do not provide sufficient stability. This trend of rising underemployment suggests that while people are finding work, the nature of that work is failing to provide the economic floor necessary for a robust middle class.

What is driving the 53.8% non-functional employment rate?

A significant portion of the American workforce is struggling with stability, as the share of the working-age population not functionally employed has risen to 53.8%. This metric indicates that more than half of the potential workforce is either completely out of work or lacks the income required to participate effectively in the economy.

While the data shows a clear divergence, several critical questions remain unanswered by the current reporting. It is unclear whether the rise in the LISEP rate is driven by a lack of available hours for existing workers or a surge in people accepting "poverty wages" out of necessity. Furthermore, the source does not clarify if the 53.8% figure includes those who have exited the labor force entirely due to disability or retirement, leaving a gap in our understanding of the true workforce detachment.