Major U.S. retail chains are shuttering hundreds of locations this autumn as they pivot toward digital sales and high-profit sites. while the trend of downsizing continues, the overall rate of closures in 2024 has slowed compared to the previous year.

Advertisement

The 40 percent drop in 2024's closure rate

The current wave of store shutdowns is less a collapse and more a refinement. According to Coresight Research, U.S. retailers are on track for fewer closures this year than in 2023. Specifically, data from Coresight Research shows that approximately 3,321 store closures were tracked through the first half of 2024, represenitng a decline of more than 40 percent compared to the same period last year.

This deceleration suggests that the most vulnerable retailers already underwent significant downsizing following the pandemic-era surge in online shopping. As a result,the closures occurring this fall are likely targeted strategic decisions rather than a systemic failure of the retail sector.. Many companies are now shifting their capital away from sheer store counts and toward loyalty programs and e-commerce infrastructure.

This shift mirrors a broader economic transition in the United States. While the general labor market remains positive, hiring has increasingly migrated toward the hospitality and health care sectors. Meanwhile, traditional retailers and white-collar industries have faced a period of slower growth, forcing a leaner approach to physical footprints.

Macy's 150-store cut and Starbucks' 250-cafe purge

Several industry giants are aggressively pruning their portfolios to protect their bottom lines. Macy's is currently executing a multi-year turnaround strategy titled "A Bold New Chapter," which involves closing roughly 150 underperforming stores by the end of 2026. The company is redirecting its resources toward luxury brands and its most successful physical locations to stabilize its market position.

Similarly, Starbucks has announced plans to close about 250 underperforming cafes across North America.. In a letter to employees, Starbucks Chief Operating Officer Mike Grams explained that the company identified locations where it could not consistently deliver the desired customer experience or achieve acceptable financial performance. This move highlights a growing trend where "brand experience" is prioritized over mere geographic ubiquity .

Walgreens' 1,200-store target versus Kroger's 60-location exit

The pharmacy and grocery sectors are also seeing significant contractions. Walgreens previously outlined a plan to shut down up to 1,200 underperforming locations over several years. while the pace has slowed, the chain continues to target "cash flow negative" sites and those with expiring leases, as noted by former CFO Manmohan Mahajan. Interestingly, Walgreens is not exiting the market entirely; the company stated in September that it would open six new locations in the coming months to better meet community needs.

In the grocery space, Kroger is slated to close 60 stores across several states by the end of 2024. As reported in the source, Kroger expects a modest financial benefit from these closures and has committed to offering alternative roles within the company to all associates affected by the shutdowns. This indicates a preference for workforce retention even as the physical footprint shrinks.

Which specific states will lose the most Kroger and Macy's stores?

Despite the clarity on the number of closures, several critical details remain missing from the current reports. While the source mentions that Macy's, Walgreens, and Kroger are closing stores across "multiple states," it does not specify which regions or cities will be hardest hit. This leaves local governments and shoppers in the dark regarding which shopping centers are most at risk.

Furthermore, there is a lack of clarity regarding the long-term employment impact. While Kroger has promised roles for its associates, it remains unclear if Macy's or Starbucks will offer similar guarantees to their displaced workers. The reporting primarily reflects the corporate perspective, leaving the actual experience of the affected employees largely unexamined.