The United States is launching new tariffs between 10 and 12.5 percent on 60 trading partners starting Friday morning. These duties target countries accused of failing to prohibit goods produced via forced labor.

Advertisement

The 99.4 Percent Trade Blanket

The scale of this latest move by the Trump administration is nearly total, impacting 60 trade partners that collectively represent 99.4 percent of all American trade. According to the report, these new rates replace a previous 10 percent tariff that expires on Thursday evening, effectively ensuring that almost no major trading partner is exempt from the new regime.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has stated that these rates are designed to punish nations that do not prohibit items manufactured with forced labor. By casting such a wide net, the US government is essentially forcing a global compliance standard on labor practices, using market access as the primary lever for enforcement.

Shifting from the Emergency Economic Powers Act to Section 301

This policy shift represents a strategic legal pivot following a significant judicial setback. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court struck down the administration's "Liberation Day" tariffs, which had been implemented using the Emergency Economic Powers Act. The court ruled against the president's interpretation that this act granted him broad, unilateral authority over duties.

To circumvent this legal barrier, the administration is now utilizing Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. As the report says, this specific authority alows the President to impose tariffs on countries that fail to effectively enforce prohibitions on the importation of goods produced with forced labor. This move suggests a transition toward more established statutory authorities to avoid further Supreme Court interventions.

The 10 Percent Tier for Canada and the United Kingdom

The administration has established a tiered system of penalties based on a country's perceived commitment to banning forced labor.. A lower 10 percent rate has been assigned to nations deemed to be enforcing these bans, a list that includes Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, India, and several Central American nations including Guatemala and Honduras.

Other major economies are facing higher or variable costs. The European Union,Japan, Korea, and Taiwan will face rates ranging from 10 to 12.5 percent, as they are viewed as "working towards compliance." All other trading partners not specifically mentioned in the lower tiers will be hit with a flat 12.5 percent rate, marking them as non-compliant in the eyes of the US Trade Representative.

The November Midterm Shield for Oil and Gas

Despite the breadth of the tariffs, the administration has carved out strategic exemptions for essential commodities. Oil, gas, certain fertilizers, and various food products are exempt from the Friday rate change. this selective leniency points to a desire to prevent spikes in energy and grocery costs for American consumers.

The timing of these exemptions is likely political, as the US approaches the November midterm elections. By shielding these specific sectors, the administration aims to avoid the inflationary pressure that typically accompanies broad tariffs, which could alienate voters sensitive to the cost of living.

The Missing Details of Jamieson Greer's March Probe

While the tariffs are based on an investigation launched by Jamieson Greer in March, the specific evidence remains opaque. The USTR determined last month that several countries were in violation of labor standards, but the report does not specify which industries or specific goods were found to be produced with forced labor.

Furthermore, the current reporting relies entirely on US government claims. It remains unknown how the 60 affected trading partners—including allies like Canada and the EU—intend to respond or whether they dispute the findings of the USTR's investigation. There is currently no public record of the specific criteria used to differentiate between a "compliant" nation and one merely "working towards compliance."