Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams recently visited Wisconsin Rapids to promote a proposed 150-megawatt data center. The event, organized by the PNK Group, was met with significant hostility from local residents concerned about resource depletion and political opportunism.

Advertisement

The 150-megawatt pitch to Wisconsin Rapids

Former Mayor Eric Adams traveled to the community of Wisconsin Rapids—a town with fewer than 20,000 residents—to act as a consultant for the PNK Group. The developer intends to repurpose a defunct paper mill into a facility for high-density computing. According to the report, the meeting was not a formal town hall but a privately arranged event intended to sway public opinion in favor of the project.

The reception was overwhelmingly negative. Residents shouted accusations at Eric Adams, labeling him a political opportunist.. Even a personal anecdote shared by the former mayor regarding the use of artificial intelligence in treating breast cancer was met with skepticism and questioning from the crowd, signaling a profound lack of trust in the messenger.

PNK Group's abandoned $10 billion Wisconsin proposal

The hostility in Wisconsin Rapids is compounded by the PNK Group's track record within the state. As reported, the developer previously walked away from a separate $10 billion data center proposal in another part of Wisconsin. The company abandoned that massive project after discovering that a public hearing would necessitate a comprehensive community-benefit review and a full environmental assessment.

This history suggests a pattern where the PNK Group may prefer curated, private events over the rigorous transparency required by state regulators. By bringing in a high-profile figure like Eric Adams, the developer attempted to use celebrity credentials to bypass the deep-seated wariness that local residents feel toward outside developers who make promises that often fail to materialize.

Why 70% of Wisconsin voters reject data center costs

The friction in Wisconsin Rapids reflects a broader statewide trend of opposition to energy-intensive technology hubs. A recent survey indicated that over 70% of registered voters in Wisconsin now believe the costs of these developments outweigh the potential returns. This represents a significant shift in public sentiment, marking a twenty-point increase in skepticism compared to the previous year.

These concerns generally center on land use, the environmental footprint of high-density computing, and the massive amounts of water required for cooling. In neighboring states, similar data center projects have been delayed or cancelled entirely following public hearings, suggesting that the "tech boom" is hitting a wall of rural resistance across the Midwest.

The missing water usage data for the paper mill site

Despite the promotional efforts of the PNK Group and Eric Adams, several critical pieces of information remain absent from the public discourse. While local authorities have called for thorough studies on power supply and long-term employment trends, the specific projected water consumption for the 150-megawatt facility has not been transparently detailed for the residents of Wisconsin Rapids .

Furthermore, the report does not clarify the specific terms of Eric Adams' consultancy role or how his experience as a city mayor trnslates to the technical and environmental requirements of a rural industrial project. Without a formal environmental assessment—the very thing that derailed the PNK Group's previous $10 billion attempt—the community is left to guess the actual impact on their local resources .