According to a recent Daily Mail report, the Keskine IPL Hair Removal Handset is being marketed as an at-home device that reduces visible hair by up to 98 percent within four weeks using intense pulsed light (IPL) technology.. The product, priced at £159.20 after a 20 percent discount code SUMMER20, has garnered nearly 4,000 reviews, with users praising its painless ice-cooling and five treatment modes.. The discount is valid through June 30, 2026, and the article highlights the device as a cost-effective alternative to salon visits.

The £159.20 price tag: what the 20% discount actually covers

The promotional price of £159.20 represents a saving of £139.80 off the original retail price of £299, as reported by Daily Mail. This places the Keskine handset squarely in the mid-range of at-home IPL devices, competing with brands like Braun and Philips Lumea that typically retail between £200 and £400. The discount code SUMMER20 is valid until the end of June 2026, a full year away — an unusually long window that suggests the manufacturer is aiming for sustained inventory turnover rather than a flash sale.

What shoppers get for the price is a device that offers five selectable modes: body, face, bikini line, underarms, and an auto-flash function for continuous pulses. The manufacturer claims full-body sessions take no longer than 24 minutes, a figure that aligns with other premium IPL devices but relies on consistent user technique. the integrated ice-cooling feature is advertised as keeping the skin comfortable, addressing a common complaint about heat-based hair removal.

Nearly 4,000 cumulative reviews: what users report after 3–4 weeks

According to the Daily Mail article, customer feedback drawn from nearly 4,000 reviews indicates a strong consensus that the device delivers professional-grade results at home. Reviewers reported observing softer regrowth, clearer skin, and a noticeable decline in hair density on legs, arms, and facial areas after three to four weeks of use. One user cited in the report praised the system for eliminating the redness and irritation commonly associated with waxing, while another described the treatment as almost painless after an initial adjustment period.

While these reviews are overwhelmingly positive, the Daily Mail piece does not disclose the platform or verification method for the testimonials. It is unclear whether the 4,000 reviews are from verified purchasers, collected across multiple e-commerce sites, or curated by the manufacturer. This makes it difficult to gauge potential bias or the percentage of users who may have experienced less dramatic results.

The 24-minute full-body claim: how IPL compares to salon laser

The Keskine handset uses intense pulsed light, which differs from salon-grade laser technology that uses a single, more concentrated wavelength. IPL devices are generally cosidered effective for hair reduction but often require more sessions — typically 8 to 12 — to achieve results comparable to laser, according to dermatological guidelines. The manufacturer's claim of up to 98 percent reduction within four weeks stands in contrast to clinical studies that typically show 50–80 percent reduction over a longer period for IPL devices at home.

The 24-minute full-body treatment time is another selling point. for context, a professional IPL session for legs alone can take 30–45 minutes and cost £50–£100 per session.. The Keskine's upfront cost of £159.20 would therefore be recouped after just two or three salon visits, if the device delivers on its promise. However, the Daily Mail report does not cite independent clinical trials or dermatologist endorsements; the claims rely on the manufacturer's marketing and user reviews alone.

What is still unknown: independent clinical trial results and long-term safety

Despite the positive coverage, several gaps remain. The Daily Mail articlle does not mention any independent clinical trial data verifying the 98 percent reduction statistic. Consumers are left to trust the manufacturer's assertion, which may be based on internal testing or selected user diaries. Long-term safety data for home-use IPL devices, particularly around eye protection and skin type compatibility, is also absent from the report. The device is likely unsuitable for darker skin tones or certain medical conditions, but no contraindications are discussed.

Another open question is the product's regulatory status. In the UK, at-home IPL devices are not subject to the same rigorous pre-market approval as medical laser equipment; they fall under general consumer safety regulations. This means the burden of proof for efficacy and safety rests largely with the manufacturer. Until independent verifiers or consumer watchdog groups weigh in , the Keskine handset remains a product with strong anecdotal support but limited external validation.